Are these people on the payroll of the Democrats and/or other special interest groups who have a vested interest in the upcoming election, or are they just spammers who keep trying to drum up hits on the site?
2006-09-28 02:59:46 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Spy: the thumbs downs (?) weren't from me. I believe in questioning, but a little proof would be nice. Why does everyone question the WTC with conjecture but accept flight 93 at face value?
2006-09-29 02:55:10 · update #1
I have come to this board and thought I was seeing a Loose Change commercial.
2006-09-28 03:03:08 · answer #1 · answered by MEL T 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Mostly spammers probably, though there was a pretty professionally done web-site dedicated to bashing "Path to 9/11" before the movie was even shown. In any case, there are enough fat-cat far-left Liberals out there who, I expect, would fund conspiracy movies - the money didn't have to come directly from the Democrat party.
2006-09-28 15:01:25 · answer #2 · answered by Will 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually I have seen a conspiracy theory that proposes that since some of the claims are so wild and outrageous that it is right wingers trying to pollute the debate of real questions with silly rhetoric. I found this contention rather amusing actually. Strangely enough it is more credible than the claims of the diehard conspiracy nuts on these sites. Before anyone takes offense I do not support this theory or any of the other 911 conspiracies, just found it interesting.
2006-09-28 03:10:43 · answer #3 · answered by Bryan 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, they're just too easily manipulated by the media because they are too lazy to search for answers themselves.
After reading Rudy Giuliani's book which gives TRUE, FIRST-HAND insight as to the events on 9/11, I am convinced more than ever that the liberals spreading this crap should be tried for libel and treason. That would shut a few of them up.
2006-09-28 04:00:43 · answer #4 · answered by RAR24 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Must be equal opptrunity spammers as us dems are still trying to pay Monica to oepn her mouth next go around, not to mention the driving lessens for the Kennedys
2006-09-28 03:16:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Try this for a conspiracy theory. It`s a 48 page report by Dr.Steven E Jones. Physicist and Archaemetrist. No political affilition, recently suspended from his post at Brigham Young University because of a radio interview. It`s a long read but i assure you it`s worth it.
2006-09-28 03:54:37 · answer #6 · answered by dingdong 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
They're paranoid, spoiled (*&%$# basically....
btw My post last night , "Was Mark Fuhrman really behind 9/11?" was a joke. What is funny is that with all the insanity going on EVERYONE thought I was serious.....
Donald
2006-09-28 03:35:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
As I've said many times...
There are two basic "life orientations". Either the world is happening to you (passive), or you are happening to the world (active).
The conspiracy theorists are just over-the-top believers that we are all victims of great, unknown forces being marshaled against us. I guess for them, it's easier to accept the uncomfortable parts of life, if you can blame someone else.
I prefer to take personal responsibility for my successes, AND for my shortcomings.
2006-09-28 05:26:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I honestly think they are shut in drawing an SSI check for mental illness. They probably think those are real TV documentaries.
2006-09-28 03:06:49 · answer #9 · answered by Have gun, will travel. 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
So you're proposing a conspiracy theory to explain the conspiracy theories?
2006-09-28 03:02:18 · answer #10 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋