2006-09-28 02:46:54 · 23 answers · asked by beaulieu_auto_09 1 in Social Science ➔ Sociology
Rather imposable to say
2006-09-28 02:49:46 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
South, but North London has better public transport on tubes so maybe they could make an undrground attack
2006-09-28 10:01:51 · answer #2 · answered by Bumblebois 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
West win
2006-10-01 09:11:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
For heavens sake, get a life!!! Is there not enough crap going on in the world without London splitting in two?
WHY?
2006-10-01 10:33:43 · answer #4 · answered by SUPER-GLITCH 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Westenders
2006-09-28 12:14:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither would win they would finish each other off. Then we could get rid of london altogether.
2006-09-28 09:58:17 · answer #6 · answered by SilverSurfer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NORTH LONDON MORE MONEY TO PAY THE SOUTH TO FIGHT ITSELF
2006-09-28 11:54:50 · answer #7 · answered by RAMSBOTTOM 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Lets get in on to find out.
I fink Saaaaff wud win dow
2006-09-28 09:57:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Old Bill
2006-09-28 09:50:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The rest of the country, as hopefully they would be to bruised and battered to bother with the rest of us for a while
2006-09-28 11:47:13 · answer #10 · answered by Jim G 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be a draw with all percipients hopefully expiring
and me being the ref / rules of engament,None
2006-09-28 10:01:19 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋