Is this the recently deceased son?
2006-09-28 02:20:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Oh brother -- this saga just won't away. Less than three weeks after the tagic passing of her son, Anna Nicole Smith has married her long-time attorney and close confidante, Howard K. Stern. The happy couple said their I dos this morning at 10:30 am in the Bahamas. Star magazine has the dish:
'In a world-exclusive report, an eyewitness tells Star that Anna, 38, and Howard, 37, tied the knot at 10:30 am on the morning of September 28, on a 50-foot catamaran anchored off Blackbeard's Cay in Nassau! "There was heavy security around the yacht, plus extra speedboats to deliver more supplies as needed (including unlimited Dom Perignon champagne) from the island to the catamaran," says the eyewitness, who adds that the wedding party celebrated the union afterwards by having a swim party around the yacht — "and Anna was wearing a pink bikini!"'
Stay tuned on this one. If we've learned anything from this story it's that nothing is as it appears to be. Is this a love marrige or could this be a legal maneuver to ensure that Howard gets custody of baby Dannie Lynn Hope?
2006-09-29 18:16:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by laney45 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
While I am sure it would be hard to have a new baby and then lose your older child within days Anna Nicole deserves sympathy for that.
It is really a sad situation.
She embarassed Daniel many, many times in public.
But she was his mom and he loved her regardless of her antics.
She loved Daniel in her own selfish way.
I imagine he caught lots of ridicule from school, friends & life in general being her son.
The kid had to be on some type of medications to put up w/ her.
From what little I saw of her show my heart ached for him the way she acted in front of him.
Hopefully he is now at peace & my heart goes out to him & his loved ones.
But this other BABY DADDY DRAMA she or her longtime friend/lawyer/lover/husband now are creating is bound to have the little girl just as screwed up as her mom.
THEY (AN & HS) are the idiots causing all of this talk.
So I feel no pity in regards to this matter.
Obviously, she hasn't learned a thing from mistakes she might have made w/ her son as she is already making the baby have a life bound to be just as filled w/ ridicule as poor Daniel's life was.
It's all about ANNA NICOLE.
Her & that Stern dude should admit the truth & quit trying to deny Larry Birkhead rights to his daughter.
On (Larry King) Howard certainly didn't look like a "happy father" or whatever BS spilled out his mouth.
I am sure he was at a loss from Daniel's death as well being around him so long but it seems quite obvious he was lying.
In contrast Larry Birkhead actually seemed like he was overjoyed at the birth of his daughter as well as being emotionally upset about Daniel's death.
So to me I think he is genuine NOT Howard Stern.
As for the truth?
It'll probably never come out.
Money talks & has a way of telling it's own "truth".
I hope for the little girl's sake (Dannie Lynn Hope or whatever) she has a chance to know her real DNA father.
And one last thought.....If I was Anna Nicole...
She is a beautiful woman, whether fat or Trim Spa, Baby slim but she is one seriously screwed up chick.
I would much rather be accused of sleeping w/ Larry Birkhead that that sleazy Stern.
LB is cuter & seems more sincere.
Stern gives me the creeps!
2006-10-01 01:04:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Cat 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
We all have NO RIGHT to judge Anna. Do you think your perfect? I think not. She's not the only famous celebrity to pose it a girlie book. Pam Anderson does the same and she left her kids at a birthday party where a child drowned! She wasn't ridiculed! Wasn't her fault sure, but she had her kids at the wrong place at the wrong time, easilty could have been one of hers, and that makes it no difference. Anna's son was of age, she had no control of what ever he may have been using/on. It's not her fault. If your child came home and died like that, would it be your fault? Knock it off. Your ignorant comments are not even funny and if it were your child maybe you'd see this. If not, maybe your the one who isn't fit to have children in your care. Anna truely loved her son Daniel, if live had no meaning anywhere's else to her, it sure did revolve around him. It's not a joking matter no matter who loses a child like this. Have some respect or hold your tongue. It just shows your ignorances.
2006-09-28 09:38:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Do you know her? We do not know anything about celebrities and if someone followed me around all day with a camera they are bound to get a shot that looks just wrong.
I would be concerned if my child was being raised by anyone else but me. Her son was a good kid so she did something right, it seems. She is a mom so she will double up on this baby and learn from her previous mistakes like we all do. She will be okay.
Attacking parenting is a new angle, I wish someone tried to capture photos of moms smoking with a baby on their hip .
2006-09-28 09:26:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by sweet pea 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Leave her alone. Can you not imagine the heartache she is going through, to have her son, her one constant in her life up to that day, die in her very room! She is human, with a lot of baggage and issues, but everyone should show her the respect a mother who has lost her child deserves. The death was per the news reports apparently due to the combination of the three drugs he was taking, but were not overdoses. His death was a reaction to the combination--unfortunately doctors don't fully explain to people how to take medications, and possible side affects that can occur.
2006-09-28 09:44:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
There are lots of "red flags" for likely psychological problems
here. That is, there are lots of things that seem to go along
with dysfunction, but there is no proven relationship. Some
are:
1: Celebrity (the children of celebrity parents tend to have
more problems with substance abuse)
2: Parents with history of sexual promiscuity (tend to have
problems with role models, reasonably interacting with
prospective relationships, etc)
I haven't seen any studies on how using ones child in a
sexually provocative manner effects the long term health
of the child, but if nothing else, it must surely create
boundary problems, wouldn't you think?
Regardless of how loving and caring she may be, her children
will have a pretty up-hill battle...
2006-09-28 09:26:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Elana 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
I would have never had sex with Anna Nicole SMith in the first place. Anyone who stooped to that is probably unfit as a parent as well.
2006-09-28 09:20:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by kingstubborn 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
You have to understand, Anne Nicole Smith is not all there. Posing provacitvly is all she knows. As for the father of her baby. He's probably some married guy who's ashamed that he had sex with her. Anne Nicole Smith is just a big joke. Unfortunatly for her, she doesn't have enough commen sense to know it.
2006-09-28 09:21:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by jdecorse25 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Anna Nicole defines dysfunctional!!!
2006-09-28 09:19:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by iamjuls 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
I think she poses that way, because that's how she 'knows' to pose. I mean, c'mon, she was a stripper. And she does have breast implants that are, uh, sizeable.
When she is out in public, she's always made up and dressed in a very fake way (compare photos of her with her new baby to most other photos~ no lipstick, hair unstyled~ vs. the "Barbie Doll" look, painted and styled.)
I will admit, it DOES look ... unusual at best... I've noticed in most of the photos with Daniel, it does look like she's coming on to him. Gives me the willies!
2006-09-28 09:34:37
·
answer #11
·
answered by AD J 2
·
0⤊
2⤋