gangully
2006-09-28 00:45:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by amit_lad2005 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Dravid
2006-09-28 21:29:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by timma21 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think neither of them are very good captain i mean to say that gangully is much more experienced than Dravid but dravid too is good.
Sometimes our captain does not play well do we see at one game that he is good or bad.They all have there chance to improve don't they?
Lets see if gangully plays well in India Green Vs India blue and see he is the captain for India green.
2006-10-01 19:56:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ganguly, Dravid is the captain, that means Indian team is doomed.
2006-09-29 15:55:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by ABHISHEK M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dravid
2006-09-28 00:53:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Uros I 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Dravid the captain haha its greg my dear is leading the show.A leader is one who leads. Can u honestly tell dravid is leading india. At the moment he is the mouth piece of Greg. He is the one who said process is more important than the result or performance. Ganguly rose above regional bias and bulit a team for future which is being meddled and muddled by chappell & co
2006-09-29 10:45:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by abk63_2000 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gangully is better than Dravid but he didn't perform well when he took over captaincy and Dravid's average is better in his captaincy period.
Gangully has 23 centuries in Odis so if he didn't perform well with his bat then it's a big lose for India.
So Dravid is better to be captain of India.
2006-09-28 19:57:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bluffmaster 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Captain first of all needs to know at what situation he should take the power play,when he should bring a spinner or fast bowler.Take batting first or take bowling he should know,When there are lot's of runs to make he should know which batsman he should send first,he should help to try to win when they ae in bad condition,So I think Dravid can and he is and he will coninue to be the best captain for India because he knows when to do those things I mentioned above.Ganguly does not help when they r in bad condition.So DRAVID ROCKS.
2006-09-28 01:29:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by jal t 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
characterists of a captain:
1.leadership quality
2.team man
3.aggresive
4.killer instinct
5.demanding
6.quality of achieving best out of a team
7.link between team and higher authorities
8.couragious
9.shud b a mental block 4 n opposition
10.performance (can b judged frm record)
11.shud not b indulged in politics
i think all these characteristics are fulfilled by ganguly. so he shud b a captain of indian team.there was no politics in indian team wen he was a captain. moreover, india has its own culture, traditions and values which says that a respect shud b given 2 seniors even if he is not 100% in all deprtments. india is not australia where a most respected captain of all times is sacked due 2 non-performance.
2006-09-28 02:50:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by crackluver007 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
there is not a second choice.It is ganguly.
he has the ability to win a game as a captain.He had made many memorable wins against many countries.If dravid was the captain then he could not face the prblems instantly.There was many matches that India was about to fail.Then it's Ganguly's captaincy that made Indians proud.
2006-09-28 19:32:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by malukollam20 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Itz dravid of course, BUt Ganguly shud be given a place in the team...the act of authorities against Ganguly is really condemnable
2006-09-28 00:51:49
·
answer #11
·
answered by Hafeel 1
·
0⤊
1⤋