It seems to me that if Jesus could perform miracles such as the bible claims, he would have done better to keep himself alive, rather then allow himself to be crucified and waste all that talent. He could've cleansed sinners while being alive, and continued healing. Nobody would ever have to be sick, because Jesus could heal them. Anybody who died could be brought back to life, like Lazarus. Everyone could be forever healthy and live forever. Wouldn't that have been more practical? Of course, that would keep Jesus busy around the clock, but God could create several versions of Jesus. By staying alive, Jesus would have acquired a lot more credibility. After all, seeing is believing. And I don't think other religions could top that, so they would eventually fall by the wayside, and Christianity would stand alone. Bingo ~ no more Holy Wars. No Crusades, no Charlemagne, no need for Oral Roberts, Ernest Angley, Jimmy Swaggert, or any other phoney baloney faith healers. What do you think?
2006-09-27
20:10:13
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Entertainment & Music
➔ Polls & Surveys
Thank you Bethany. You've helped make my point. If Jesus were alive and able to keep everyone healthy and alive, he would be morally obligated to do so. Not a very practical idea is it?
2006-09-28
05:45:51 ·
update #1
JudasRabb: Sure, it's in the right category. I'm taking both a poll and a survey. EVERY question fits this category. I also asked this question in Religion and Spirituality, if that's what you mean. And you responded there as well. Thanks for that.
2006-09-28
05:54:20 ·
update #2
JasP: Thank you for your most eloquent response, which I happen to disagree with. But you didn't answer my question.
2006-09-28
06:02:58 ·
update #3