English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The rehetoric is the same even if the object of the hate isn't:

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/26/anti-gay-summit/
http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20060927/cm_thenation/20061009party_of_dobson;_ylt=A9G_RxKlRRtFqZ8Agxf9wxIF;_ylu=X3oDMTA0cDJlYmhvBHNlYwM-


How does calling people names like in the ones in these articles make you pro-family or show that you have Christian values?

Why is okay for politicians to attend something like this summit but not a KKK rally because there really is no difference? Is it because it’s called a ‘values voters summit’ instead of a hate rally?

2006-09-27 16:48:50 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Had you actually read the stories uni you might have noticed the AUDIO link. Can't get more unibiased than that.

2006-09-27 16:58:43 · update #1

4 answers

none

2006-09-27 16:51:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Well, I am a member of both and I can tell you the cold cuts at the Summit were much better. The Klan rally has its perks, but the grand wizards wife does all the cooking (she's a wiz in the kitchen) but some people didn't get enough to eat. That makes people grumpy.

2006-09-27 16:51:18 · answer #2 · answered by Aspurtaime Dog Sneeze 6 · 1 1

The Klan is a historic hate team that has basically some thousand participants at maximum suitable. The Tea party is a reasonably new patriotic team of human beings and criminal immigrants who care approximately this usa and are frightened of the path it extremely is heading. huge debt, great unemployment, extreme inflation etc. and numbers interior the tens of millions. "maximum Klan participants at present are Republican. only ask Republican David Duke" in case you have some evidence to back this fact up, i might prefer to work out it. otherwise it extremely is barely ignorant to assert so.

2016-10-01 11:00:55 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Gee!! You don't suppose your sources are biased do you? If you were interested in being even the least bit honest, you would have an alternate perspective.

2006-09-27 16:56:20 · answer #4 · answered by unicorn 4 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers