English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

then how do you all who beleive in that evolution stuff explain how evolution started? didnt darwin even say that something had to have started evolution.
i beleive that God created the earth and humans and everything naturally from the earth. everything else is man made

2006-09-27 15:53:41 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

28 answers

You can beleive that, and thats your right. Im not going to push my veiws onto anyone else.

There are many factors in evolution we do not know either.
Todays society is built on Science and Tecnology. And scientifically speaking, its impossible to fathom such a thought. However, thats what religion is, not know but faith.

I personally, dont know what to beleive.

2006-09-27 15:56:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I believe that we were Created. Creator can create things aged. Like Adam...if you saw him the day he was created...would you see a baby or a man. Everything is possible for God. There is nothing God cannot do except violate His own nature.

Evolution theory is a theory. Evolution happens. A caterpillar morphs into a butterfly.But the monkey does not evolve to be a human. Animals and humans are made of the same stuff...of course we will have similarities.

Funny thing that as a kid I was told the fairytale when a girl kisses a frog, it turns into a man...now at the university, professors are telling that frog evolved to be a man..and that is a fact!!

And for people who ask "But who created God?" No one created God, He has been here always and that is why He is God.

2006-09-27 16:03:53 · answer #2 · answered by SeeTheLight 7 · 0 0

A clue to this was found in a famous experiment by Harold Urey. In the olden days, the earth probably had an atmosphere of methane, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and water vapor. Electrical storms would have happened then for the same reason they do now. Urey set up a spark discharge in a vessel containing the substances listed, and found that amino acids and other complex organics were created -- the stuff of life. How this might have gotten organized into the first things that we might call life, we don't know; it is possible that the tides (which were hundreds of feet high, and happened much more frequently than they do now because the moon was much closer to the earth) stirred things up in such a manner that a life form could have happened. The world is a trillion trillion times the size of Urey's flask, and there were millions of years to do the experiment. So the fact that something happened is not too surprising. The thing that IS surprising is that it appears to have happened within a few tens of millions of years of the earth's formation -- a mere blink of an eyelash in cosmic time. By comparison, it took billions of years to develop the eukaryotic cells that are the stuff of complex life today. Incidentally, evolution is now proved to be correct, so arguing against it is a waste of time.

2006-09-27 16:05:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

i have a similar belief but Darwin never once hinted at god creating anything. evolution the theory (and lets remember it is a theory) has nothing to do with any god like creature kick starting everything. one theory is comets which have been found to carry protein streams, crashing into earth in early life thus bringing the building blocks of life to earth. but then that brings up the q. of what put that into the comet in the first place. i find it hard to believe this is all by mistake but also I will not be sucked into a religion which expects me to have blind faith in an entity.

2006-09-27 15:59:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In the physical sciences, the question of the origin of life is the study of the nature in which life is theorized to have evolved from non-life sometime between 3.9 to 3.5 billion years ago. This topic also includes theories and ideas regarding possible extra-planetary or extra-terrestrial origin of life hypotheses, thought to have possibly occurred over the last 13.7 billion years in the evolution of the known universe since the big bang.

Origin of life studies is a limited field of research despite its profound impact on biology and human understanding of the natural world. Progress in this field is generally slow and sporadic, though it still draws the attention of many due to the eminence of the question being investigated. A few facts give insight into the conditions in which life may have emerged, but the mechanisms by which non-life became life are still elusive.

2006-09-27 15:56:42 · answer #5 · answered by DanE 7 · 1 0

Only a person with no understanding of evolutionary theories could ask a question like that. First of all, let's stop talking about Darwin. Evolutionary theory has progressed far beyond what he started. Next, you need to understand the structures of basic life forms with only one cell. Those forms involve simple bonding of carbon molecules and amino acid chains. Given the presence of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, and a few billion years for it to happen, it was impossible that life wouldn't form on this planet. No God is required. The other point, of course, is that if God started everything, what started God? He's just "always been?" How is that any kind of logical argument?

2006-09-27 16:00:39 · answer #6 · answered by Paul J 3 · 0 1

Existence of God arguments have been proposed by philosophers, theologians, and other thinkers. In philosophical terminology, existence of God arguments concern schools of thought on the epistemology of the ontology of God.

There are many philosophical issues concerning the existence of God. Some definitions of God's existence are so nonspecific that it is certain that something exists that meets the definition; while other definitions are clearly logically impossible since the definition contradicts itself. Epistemological problems such as the "problem of the supernatural" cause no end to the misunderstandings involved in arguments for and against the existence of God

Arguments for the existence of God typically include metaphysical, empirical, inductive, and subjective. Arguments against the existence of God typically include empirical, deductive, and inductive. Conclusions reached include God exists and this can be proven; God exists, but this cannot be proven or disproven; God does not exist; and no one knows.

2006-09-27 15:56:34 · answer #7 · answered by Linda 7 · 1 0

Well, I believe as the scientists explained, that after there was a collision in space, it formed the planets. Luckily, Earth had an ingredient able to produce life. That produced many single cell organisms and bacteria which later evolved into larger creatures who evolved further. Why do you even bring this up? People can believe what they want. Just because you think somethign doesn't mean someone can't think differently.

2006-09-27 15:57:08 · answer #8 · answered by Jae 2 · 1 1

To stoner's wrote the bible one month at the same time as they were sitting through the fringe of the Nile - i idea anybody knew that. heavily although, guy wrote the bible as a device to regulate the 1000's. reality! And what in the international is an astesehits? And harry potter only exists in books and the films he, too isn't genuine, only an identical as your meant GOD - a GOD that hates at each turn, you're a sinner because you've been born, you're a sinner in case you fornicate - what a load of codswallop! those are guy's guidelines and stupid ones at that.

2016-11-24 23:40:50 · answer #9 · answered by brigance 4 · 0 0

How do you explain how God just "existed" out of nowhere? Also, if you ever even bothered to study science in school, you know that NATURAL things are NATURALLY adapted to their environment and not man made. I cannot state that God didn't make this, I'm just saying it's doubtful He did. SOMETHING had to start God. Life wouldn't make sense if He just popped out of nowhere.

2006-09-27 15:57:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers