English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

Well I don't have anything negative to say. But I can explain some of the things everyone else was saying. The seats may seem uncomfortable but NASA invented the foam for the seats and posture pedic designed the shape of it for better back support. As for gas guzzling... yes to a point, if you get the 5.7 v8 then you have the multi disbursement. Which if you are driving and you need only 4cylinders, that's all it uses. The magnum can drive easy around corners because of a couple of thing. It has near 50-50 distribution from the front end to the back end of the magnum. It also has ESP which is what it sounds like. It knows to a point what you are trying to do and trys to help.

2006-09-28 03:01:42 · answer #1 · answered by cargrl 3 · 0 0

The only problem is that it's a gas guzzler, like most Dodges. However, if you have the money to buy a brand new Magnum, this shouldn't matter to you. I currently own a 1987 Dodge Ram W-150 (4x4 Power Ram) and I'm pretty sure it gets around 8, 10, MAYBE 12. It has a 318 CI V8, offroad tires, and is bare bones inside. I love it!!!! Simply because it sounds fricken awesome, like almost all Dodges.

In response to 'United': Chrysler does not have a problem with poor quality. My Mom and Dad both have Dodge Vehicles, and they both work perfectly. My mom has a 2002 Dodge Intrepid, in perfect running order, and my dad ordered a 2004 model year Dodge Ram 2500 with a Cummins, and the only thing wrong is his hygeine, by which I mean, he doesn't keep the truck clean on the inside.

2006-09-27 18:06:15 · answer #2 · answered by The Crow 3 · 1 0

Early this summer I drove several Charger, Magnum, 300C and Crossfire SRTs on a road racing course. Although all were exhilarating to drive, I thought the Magnum actually had a better handling balance. Note that this observation is very subjective! Speaking of subjective, the Magnum's styling is not its strong point. Rear seat headroom is the best out of this group. The gas mileage was no worse than the rest of this gas-guzzling crowd.

2006-09-27 19:37:45 · answer #3 · answered by db79300 4 · 1 0

Nothin is really negative about the magnum jus the seats are 2 stiff any first for bout the first 5000 miles then they start to soften jus a little bit. But that with all the cars Daimler-Chrylser makes

2006-09-27 17:17:30 · answer #4 · answered by M M 1 · 2 0

If you dont get what your looking for here, you should try googling Dodge magnum reviews. From what i've expirenced from them there pretty nice cars. Good acceleration, and not bad gas mileage.

2006-09-27 17:11:49 · answer #5 · answered by newsurfprodject 2 · 2 0

Cool car but the warranty is only like for 3 years so if you will have a new car in the next 3 years I would get one.

2006-09-27 17:22:42 · answer #6 · answered by crocadilen 2 · 0 0

nothing really, except probably the fuel efficiency, but other than that its a pretty good car.

2006-09-27 17:11:37 · answer #7 · answered by keepmewithyou 2 · 2 0

I thinks its cool but my wife says but it is a station wagon. So be it but a very cool station wagon

2006-09-27 17:13:48 · answer #8 · answered by terry h 2 · 2 0

The rear window is very small, limiting the rear view. It is also heavy.

2006-09-27 19:19:02 · answer #9 · answered by thisissoohot3 2 · 0 1

It's a Dodge.

2006-09-27 17:10:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers