Evolution question?

Question

If we evloved how did we reproduce? I mean didn't we have to have a male and femlae to start things off? The way reprodution works it takes a male and female, so how did the first 2 get here in the first place. I have always wonderd this.

I do not need science to back up my faith. It is a point I am trying to make for those who lack faith in God. I am a Christian and I don't believe in evlolution

Adam and Eve makes way more senec thatn evloving from an asexual whatever!

Answer 1

read genesis and you'll know how man and women were created.
as for you not believing in evolution you should really look up the meaning of it. Things are constantly evolving, whether it be creating a better of itself or mutating into something that eventually causes it to die off. Evolution is something God created so more can come of his creation. Think about it!!

Answer 2

Unfortunately there is some logic to it.

Aphids, slime molds, sea anemones can reproduce either asexually or sexually. Hence they are a bridge between the lowest form of life and more complex forms of life.

Some frogs, can, indeed, change sex.

This explains transgenderism.

It can also be one explaination of homosexuality where indeed a female brain is trapped in a male body. When transgender changes fail to fully occur.

Science states all fetuses are created female and then at the 7th week those designed as males experience a transgender change and it's docuemented and can be proven repeatedly.

If the transgender change is incomplete you end up with a homonal inbalance that doesn't meet up with the physical equipment.

That, however, is still theoritical, but it could be proven at any time in view of the Genomoe mapings.

This the Huxley syndrome of putting a bit of alchol desitined for a D- Worker into an A+ Psychologist.

That Brave New World reality is starting to get closer to being true ever day with stem cells and clonning on the horizion.

Answer 3

I am not an expert in any of this, for sure, but the assumption is that life started out as VERY simple, single-celled organisms, and over time, evolved into more complicated forms. Simple critters are capable of reproducing a-sexually. I guess at some point, once life began getting complicated enough to require "our" sort of reproduction, evolution had worked it out. I believe there are critters even today that can switch whether they are male or female, and I think there are also some that start out one way and end up another... Just an idea!

Answer 4

I have always wondered why people need science to back up their faith?

Anyway, the variety of life cycles is very great. It is not simply a matter of being sexual or asexual. There are many intermediate stages. A gradual origin, with each step favored by natural selection, is possible (Kondrashov 1997). The earliest steps involve single-celled organisms exchanging genetic information; they need not be distinct sexes. Males and females most emphatically would not evolve independently. Sex, by definition, depends on both male and female acting together. As sex evolved, there would have been some incompatibilities causing sterility (just as there are today), but these would affect individuals, not whole populations, and the genes that cause such incompatibility would rapidly be selected against.

Answer 5

The science behind evolution explains perfectly how males and females came to be. The first life was A-sexual. But since you say you don't seem to want scientific evidence, it is hard to explain. Basically, the first answer is a good one. reproducing in pairs is a much more desirable trait then a-sexual reproduction, so it evolved into most species.

Answer 6

Virii don't have sexes but they reproduce in a way similar to sexual reproduction. They attach to a host cell and inject their genetic material into the cell. It uses it's DNA and the cell to create copies of itself. This is an intermediate step between sexual and asexual reproduction and a likely path that simple organisms followed in becoming more complex and eventually evolving to use sexual reproduction as we know it today.

Since you "don't need science" then why ask the question?

Answer 7

Evolution was thought up with tons of holes, and you just mentioned one of them. The only reason people believe in evolition is because it "looks" accurate between all the animals, but where's the actualy study?

Other holes in the theory of evolution:
-The world is far too young to support evolution!
-If the leg of a land animal evolved into the wing of a bird, wouldn't it become a bad leg before a good wing? And what about the arm, and the face, and the digestive track?
-For a bacteria to evolve into man is even more likely than the first living cell to appear.

That's 3 of about 25 I currently know of. Sorry if this made you feel a little upset, is not my intention to win a debate with you, I just thought this stuff is kind of interesting. If you want to read more, check out www.creationscience.com

Answer 8

Well if we evolved we would have had to evolve from something. If you think about for a second there is an animal (when I get that info i will post it) that all of them are born females and form into the male counterpart when reproducing.

Answer 9

Evolution is a load of cow dung for a better way of putting it. Evolutionists want you to believe that first life sprang from non life in a primordial ooze. Then somewhere along the line the single cell organism(ever check out the structure of a single cell - beyond comprehension that a living cell, so complex sprang from nothing living) divided into both plant and animal cells, then again the animal cell somewhere divided off into female and male animal cells with all their complexity and had to be close to each other as well so they could mate, and then again to something with sight, and so on and so on. Sounds far fetched doesn't it. Jehovah God explains things in a believable manner in his word except to those whose desire is to be from apes, I guess that's so they can behave like them without consequences I reckon.

Answer 10

Evolution ~ do you think that the "repeating effect" allowed man to get a handle on the real "bad-guys"...and so, well, there was no escape for them/us but to change? I mean perhaps the "bad-guy" would either learn and improve on his own or else he would be CONFRONTED.

What is evolution? ~ EXTENTS

And so, well, there is what came before and what will come next, but I do say ~ let us build a BETTER WORLD here and now ~ there is the notion of "this trail" and what we can do.

Seiten happy days, yeah!
Bean line dances, horray!
Nut case parties, zip!
Seedy motions, cappish.

BE VEGAN