Hearing his 20 minute rant just brightened my day. The look on that jerk interviewers face was priceless.
2006-09-27 05:50:50 · 24 answers · asked by rabble rouser 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Here's part of it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvQmrtuQUnI
2006-09-27 06:12:23 · update #1
Just so you all know -
Clinton was lured into that discussion under the pretense that they would be talking about something entirely different....
FOX LIED AGAIN....
but Clinton was ready for them.
2006-09-27 06:16:41 · update #2
I LMAO when I saw the interview. Chris Wallace did look like he had a smirk on his face, but that's just him. He always looks like that. I commend Clinton for letting Wallace have it and FOX should stop interviewing people under false pretenses, or atleast have their employees remain ethical, and UNBIASED as they claim they are " Fair and Balanced " o.k. whatever. Murrdoch is obviously stabbing his buddies in the back again! Ratings! Ratings! Ratings! means $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
2006-09-27 06:22:35 · answer #1 · answered by sicilia 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I throughly enjoyed it. Bill Clinton has always been the consummate politician. To see him act like a raving madman was priceless. Good to see that the stress of not doing anything for 8 years about terrorism, and finally being taken to task for it is getting to him. Liberals can proclaim this as a victory all they want, but it is a loser come poll time. Clinton is a liar, and now because he lost his cool we have plenty of tape to prove it. He is trying to cover facts that are part of the record in his own words. Yep getting mad was the best thing he could do for the Republican Party. The sad part is that he might have been able to make some valid points if he could just tell the truth, and in this case keep his cool, but then that is the curse of the liberal. If your facts, or in this case lies can't dispel the message, attack the messenger.
rabble_rouser: Your facts are in error: Mr. Clinton agreed to the interview. The agreement was that half the interview would be devoted to the Global Initiative forum, and the other half to whatever Fox wanted to ask. There were questions about the Global Initiative forum before Clinton went into his tirade. Get your facts straight, this was not an ambush, and the question Did you do enough to connect the dots? was a result of emails received from viewers during the interview. It is also a perfectly legitimate question that many people have been asking.
2006-09-27 13:05:11 · answer #2 · answered by Bryan 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Clinton went off because the interview hit a raw nerve......he did next to nothing to stop Bin Laden. CLinton ordered the bombing of 2 largely unmammed terrorist camps. He REFUSED The Sudans offer to arrest Bin Laden and hand him over to the US....hes guilty and knows it. If he spent less time lying and more time actually trying to help the American people instead of himself he might have done something worthwhile. Hes just an arrogant, lying narcissist.
2006-09-27 14:12:34 · answer #3 · answered by Kevin P 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Since I voted for Clinton, and nearly every Democrat Presidential contender since the Vietnam War, I have to accept my share of the responsibility for the danger my children and grandchildren now face. I was an uneducated, pampered, typically American isolationist idiot! Now, my kids face living in Beirut, on our own soil, while the likes of Clinton and McCain protect the sensibilities of the TERRORISTS!!!!
I should have known, as a feminist, as soon as the democrats told me I should tolerate perjury because every man deserves the right to cheat on his wife and family!!!!!!!!!!!
How can you still believe in that jerk?
2006-09-27 13:56:31 · answer #4 · answered by angrygramma 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I liked it. If the democrats want to beat the Cons in the next election, they have to be as direct and confrontational as them. Lets face it, the Republican machine has been slinging bullshit and dirt since the 94 elections. Time for payback. Chris Wallace isn't even a tenth of the person his father was - either by ethics, ability, or character. That is why he is with the Faux News Network (they hire all of the rejects from other networks)
Go for it Bill. Time to set the record straight with this do-nothing Cons!
2006-09-27 13:12:27 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. PhD 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
He showed to us his true character, or lack thereof. Just a has been egotistical pathological liar as always. He brought more shame to the office of the President than any other. At least Johnson and Nixon had the guts to quit. This guy does not even have the courage to just go away.
2006-09-27 13:02:46 · answer #6 · answered by RANDLE W 4 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Clinton looked like the jerk. Instead of chasing interns in the oval office, he should have been more engaged in running the country and defeating Osama Bin Laden.
2006-09-27 12:58:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Yes i did. It showed he did nothing and he went out like a mad dog trying to save the last little piece of face he had. If he had done something prior to 9-11 he would have just said" look at the facts" but because the facts are he did nothing he went off on a tangent and tried to bully the interviewer.
2006-09-27 12:57:08 · answer #8 · answered by Bill 3 · 7⤊ 4⤋
yea, He just once again proved how good the Clinton's are at manipulating the media. Just watch and see if Hillary doesn't come back and say its all right wing political spin just like she did when ol Bill got caught with his pants down. They are among the great politicians. What we need are great leaders....
2006-09-27 13:04:48 · answer #9 · answered by ready to rumble 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Finally he gave us the answers we needed and wanted. Not to mention they made sense. Atleast his answer wasn't something like Bush would have given.."Uhm...not sure why we are there..uhmm...where are we again? Pakistan? Hmmm.....When I know what to do about this problem I will let ya know,till then stay the course!"
And get over the ******* thing,Bush screws everyone!!
2006-09-27 13:04:03 · answer #10 · answered by Holly 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋