Can you trust G. W. Bush?

Question

Is he as a President really reliable?

Answer 1

Let me ask the same question right back at you. Can you trust the president of Iran? Can you trust al Qaeda? Can you trust the talaban? Can you trust the new york times to give away military secrets?

And your worried about George W Bush?

I find it odd that the media likes to bad mouth him at every turn. When the things they say about him don't stand the test of time and the light of truth, they don't report that part. Why is that do you suppose? A document was leaked to the new york times indicating that the terror problem was getting worse and it was all George's fault. So George decided to just let the rest of the documnt out to the public. Have you seen it? Have you read it? Has the new york times retracted anything? No. Why is that? Because it is the ambition of the new york times to embarass the president even if it has to be a little dishonest to do so. George bush was not spying on all of america. He was spying on those who were talking to al Qaeda. I don't have a problem with that. Do you? If so, why? If al Qaeda is planing another strike in your neighborhood, don't you want to know about it? Don't you want some one to figure it out and stop them BEFORE they kill you and your family?

I think you have many other things to worry about. You ought to be worried about how reliable your source of information is. You ought to be worried about how we are going to gather inteligence about our enemies if the new york times is going to make it more difficult for us to do that. You ought to be worried about why the supreem court has endowed our enemies with constitutional rights as if they were born here and lived here, even though they are in a foriegn country or here ileagally.

The president of Iran has promised more than once to rain fire down on America. After his trip to America he returned home and repeated the statement. It was in arabac so the new york times didn't carry the story.

How reliable is George W Bush? I pray to God he is very relaible because he is the only one who is willing to stand up to all the hype and critisisim in order to protect you even while you are wondering if he is a lier or not.

Who wants to rain fire down on america? Osama and the president of Iran.
Who wants to kill Americans just because they are americans? Osama and the president of Iran?
Who wants to deny the holocost every happened. The president of Iran.
Who wants to make the world islam at the end of a sword (in violation of your constitutional rights by the way)? Osama and the president of Iran.
Who have you got in mind to replace George W Bush? If you coud put any one in office that you wanted, who would it be? Remember that if they don't fight against these people, you lose your head and war comes to the shores of america. We really will have fighting in our own streets. Our own blood will soak into our own soil. So you have to have some one who is willing to stand up to them even though any effort they make (especially if its effective) will be critisised morning noon and night.

So who have you got in mind that will put up with that crap from the very people he is trying to protect and still be willing to protect them? Go a head tell us who your man/woman is. Who have you got that will protect you and make the democrats and the media happy? Name just one.

Answer 2

Well to give a direct answer NO, Bush is not reliable as a President. He has led our country into a never ending war on false pretenses. You cannot fight a war against someones ideologies, and how can you trust a man that tries to fight them?

When Colin Powell, the only member in his cabinet at that time with any military experience, was adamantly against the war what did he do? Even his father was against the idea of war and told him not to attack Iraq, yet he still did it. How can you trust someone who knowingly and willfully send his citizens into harms way especially when his father, a former war time President with war experience advises against it. If it were his daughters I bet the outcome would have been a little different. It is easy to sit back and say that we have not been attacked but just think, have we not been attacked because of Bush's WAR or TERROR or because these terrorist organizations do not want to attack us. These organizations take their time in planning an attack and if they wanted to attack use again they would, and very much could at any given point in time. There is no possible way that our Homeland can be completely secure and impenetrable at all times.

Answer 3

I'm not a bush supporter or a bush hater but what many people don't get or understand is that the president really has not that much power over some decisions that are made in this country it's all in congress !! congress!! your state senators their the source most of the times

Answer 4

I don't like the man but you know what I think he is doing what he thinks is right and I would like to see some other people do half the stuff he has for this country I mean I know he is not every ones idle but some people like him and that is OK he has shown us the best thing about our govt. no one can stay president for ever. someday someone new will be in his shoes and then they will know how he feels.

Answer 5

GWBush is an honest and Christian man, with a strong belief in America, and with a strong belief in what is best for America.

Do I trust him? Yes. He makes decisions based on what he believes is best for America. I trust people like that.

Do I always agree with him on what is best for America? No, I do not. Spending, the role of government in education & welfare, the role or need for UN & NATO, the failure to use his bully pulpit to castigate those Democrats whose actions are harming the US and aiding our enemies, etc.

Answer 6

I don't trust him. If he says that the nation is under attack by terrorists, I won't believe him. I trust the FBI and the other agencies more than Bush.

Answer 7

No way! that is pitiful to work obtainable are people who're nonetheless brainwashed obtainable. I "help our troops," yet although, why are you asserting "convey 'em residing house" in the event that they enlisted themselves? They had to bypass, so enable them to stay till they decide that war isn't a game the place you chase one yet another around with water weapons and pretend to be harm and fall to the floor. i do no longer help Bush's conflict in Iraq - no war has been declared, so as that is why I restrain from asserting "war in Iraq." you may't combat terrorism; that is an oxymoron in itself! the guy lies to hundreds of thousands of voters each and every time he opens his mouth - why might I have faith him with my infants? His loss of regard for human life additionally might hassle me. sturdy element the media consistently follows him while he is going to school rooms for visits. wish this enables! ;-)

Answer 8

I trust that he has difficulties telling the truth! I also trust him to be an idiot and a dimwitted person... is that what you meant? I also find that he's funny as hell when he starts with his Norm Crosby routine with his malapropism; I trust that he won't disappoint me and make me laugh!

Answer 9

yes,and he is doing a great job.he tells you what he's going to do, and then what's he go and do? he actually does what he says he'll do. it's wiggin' a lot of people out!!!!them never having had to deal with the truth before in any form or fashion

Answer 10

Yes, in the same way you can trust leprosy to be a bad thing.