2006-09-26 14:31:04 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
It is.
What do you think Quantum Physics is for?
2006-09-26 14:33:15 · answer #1 · answered by the nothing 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Good and evil are open for interpretation. Sure there are many things where goodness or evilness can be distinguished, but you also find that sometimes, the difference between what is good and what is evil is so minute, it's literally not there at all. Obvious polarities are virtually nonexistent in relations to good or evil.
So to answer your question, no.
2006-09-26 21:43:49 · answer #2 · answered by LZ1980 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. Good and evil are human constructs, and the universe is not built around us. The universe has no more care for human morality than a sunset or a hurricane.
2006-09-26 21:35:06 · answer #3 · answered by Scott M 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's too absolutist. I would call the poles Constructive and Destructive. We require both in our lives. The optimum is a balance between. Too much of either is bad, not enough of either is bad.
2006-09-26 21:50:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not everything is Yin and Yang.It's true for every action there is a reaction but not always ,if there is good there is a just as powerful evil.Satan is as evil as it gets and he is in no way equal to his creator,not even close.So what you percieve as reverse polarity isn't necessarily so.
2006-09-26 21:39:30 · answer #5 · answered by AngelsFan 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wow !!! Too deep for this Ol' Sasquatch at this time of night. I may come back and review this, though.
I appreciate the question though!
Regards and Blessings,
Sasquatch Ã
2006-09-26 21:41:32 · answer #6 · answered by Ol' Sasquatch 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would say no. Good and evil are relative terms. Positive and Negative maybe.
2006-09-26 21:37:09 · answer #7 · answered by Kaiser32 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
At least that's a thought that doesn't involve carpenters dying for our souls to rise to heaven. Bravo.
Sounds Zoroastrian to me....
http://flushaholybook.com
2006-09-26 21:34:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Oh, wow. Can I get back to you on that after I've had another glass of wine? Whew, that's deep.
2006-09-26 21:36:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
no, it would likely be negative and positive. Negative doesn't have to mean evil, although evil is negative.
2006-09-26 21:35:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋