or some states of the u.s.a how effective in law concerning convictions in court are the results of lie detector tests. Also are they in your opinion a legitimate means of showing the guilty from the not guilty or are they just electronic wizzardry to put the accused in a "odds stacked against him/her" scenario from the onset playing on the GAMES up buddy dont even try fooling us (police)reguardless of false positives /false negatives even pathological liers can test negative because the individual believes 100% what they are saying is truthful and it is not so,is there to much room for error
2006-09-26 13:33:12 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
Don't trust anyone, there all the same, out for there own good. Follow the good lord* and screw the rest of the world.
* Lord can be anyone/anything you want it to be. Just stay clear of organised religion.
2006-09-26 13:43:55 · answer #1 · answered by Mungo 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I have been to 34 states in u.s.a. They, are all different, that is the interest value. I would think some are so backward that lie detectors are admissable as evidence. Red neck country, trailerpark trashville etc. There are very poor and religiouse and ignorant people in the u.s.a., (yes here too, but there, they are extreme) I think the polyograph is proberbly a reasonable tool for nervousness, but to hang a man because he is nervouse for bieng wired up to a machine on a hot sweaty day. No.
2006-09-26 14:14:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Polygraph test results are rarely used in a trial for the very reasons you stated. And I've never heard of a conviction based solely on these test results.
2006-09-26 13:36:37 · answer #3 · answered by beez 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Its, as you quite rightly stated: 'quote' electronic wizzardry to put the accused in a "odds stacked against him/her" scenario. 'unquote'. and as such is not, in my opinion, at all fair or legit! Also, I seriously doubt it would stand-up in court!
Mikey.
2006-09-26 22:11:56 · answer #4 · answered by Mikeo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
faith and anarchy won't be able to bypass mutually. To be seen a faith, it would be prepared and you may associate your self with it as a team. in actuality anarchist communities are a contradiction in words.
2016-10-18 01:04:54 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Polygraphs are not admissible, but they are a great intimidation tool.
2006-09-26 13:42:27 · answer #6 · answered by JOHN 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
While they may suggest your desire to prove the truth, they are totally unreliable.
Regards,
Sasquatch Ü
2006-09-26 13:39:22 · answer #7 · answered by Ol' Sasquatch 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They are not admissable in court.
2006-09-26 13:35:29 · answer #8 · answered by normobrian 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋