Yes, check this out:
http://reluctant-messenger.com/origen1.html
2006-09-26 10:03:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Catlady 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
could desire to honest Catholics settle for evolution as authentic? No, yet they could settle for it, with the right theological skills in place, without contradicting their faith. despite if guy's physique quite greater from a subhuman species isn't, as such, a theological situation despite if, in a roundabout way, it may desire to have some theological implications; that's specially a query of medical data. fantastically much 11 years in the past, Pope John Paul II, in an handle to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, brought about fairly a stir by skill of asserting that "new understanding has further approximately the popularity of the belief of evolution as greater desirable than a hypothesis." some Catholics, extremely traditionalists, believed that the Holy Father replace into stepping exterior of his competence in making judgments on medical concerns. Others, which contain Catholic scientists, welcomed Pope John Paul's reaffirmation of the classic Catholic concept that "certainty can't contradict certainty." A decade until now, the secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the religion, Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, further a chain of homilies that have been printed in 1990 under the call interior the beginning up . . . : A Catholic information of the story of introduction and the autumn. In those homilies, he made the same argument: The introduction tale in Genesis is a non secular history. It in simple terms would not count what actual skill God used to create the international and all residing creatures therein; what concerns is that guy is the two physique and soul, and his introduction isn't finished until God has breathed the breath of life into him. And with regard to the introduction of the soul (and, to that end, of the completed guy), technological know-how can let us know no longer something.
2016-12-12 15:40:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by zabel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If by reincarnation you mean returning to life on this earth in some other body, then no. Christians believe that the soul will be resurrected at the last day. We will be clothed again in our own bodies, which will be glorified into something perfect. We don't know exactly what that will be at this time. Then we will face our Eternal God for judgement, after which we'll go to our eternal reward or eternal damnation. Central to every "flavor" of Christianity is the truth that Jesus Christ's sacrificial death on the cross is the only means by which we can enter heaven. This is called being born again, or being saved, or putting your life under the blood.
2006-09-26 10:06:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sorry, there is only one body per soul. But the idea is really cool. In Revelations, it states that all dead souls will be reincarnated and all who were in evil will be thrown into the lake of fire. After that, there will be no more pain, suffering, death, or crime in the world. This is paraphrased from the Bible.
2006-09-26 10:04:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by nancy b 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
How could God, who made the universe with all its beauty and ordered complexities, be so cheap that He needs to recycle souls?
Evolution of the soul? I don't get it. Do you mean humans are evolving morally as well? We can fill a football stadium with dead babies that have been aborted, make anthrax, nuke the planet 4 times over, and you say we are evolving?
2006-09-26 10:08:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've never noticed such taught in scripture, but many early Church Fathers did indeed believe in reincarnation.
2006-09-26 10:02:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by KDdid 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, there's no such thing as reincarnation. It's like believing in horoscopes.
2006-09-26 10:01:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, Gnostic Christianity, or other esoteric(for the few) forms of christianity.
Not with the main stream, as it is dictated to the massses largely.
2006-09-26 10:03:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Br. Benjamin 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's all fine, just steer clear of "Big Foot". Believing in him is a one way ticket south my friend.
2006-09-26 10:03:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bran McMuffin 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not really - it might have been before around 300 CE.
2006-09-26 10:01:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by a_blue_grey_mist 7
·
0⤊
0⤋