Who flew the planes if 9 hijackers turned up alive?
How did a plane hit the pentagon if its over 100' long and only made a 16' hole?
Why were the engines of the plane missing if they are made of steel and titnium with a combined weight of 12T, and stell and titnium has a melting point of 2700F, with the fire less then 1400F
Why was thermite dripping from the towers, How did it get there?
Why was there a 1200% Increase in AA put contracts on 9-10-01
Why was all the evidence sold to china before anybody can invesigate?
How did the cell phones work so well at such a high attitude?
Why was william rodreiez, a janitor in the building, offered millions of dallors to shut up, and to not tell people he saw bombs explosing in the basement?
Why did the firefighters see bombs going off in the building before they got out?
http://www.myspace.conspiracyalert click on "911 was carried out by us govt"
Please answer my questions w/out personally insulting me, with no facts. Thanks.
2006-09-26 09:58:03 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
or you can search google video for "loose change" very interesting. and yes they are explosives that go off in the building. if the plane caused the building to collapse would it really have fallen perfectly straight down? imploded? shouldnt it have fell at more of an angle due to the planes impact of that really was the case that the plane caused the building to come down? very good video more people should watch it.
2006-09-26 10:01:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Don't mean to be insulting, but you make claims that are not true and not even rational. It would have taken thousands of US agents to pull that off and a few years planning so you are talking about two administrations. Enough people that there would have been a noticeable rise in disappearances or murders to get rid of them all. It doesn't make sense on the face of it, much less when you really examine it.
Use real sources--nothing on myspace counts. Any ****** can put up a website that says anything because there is no peer review. Peer reviewed articles are like this:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
Note: Popular Mechanics is a long term and respected publication. There are lots of other examples. Some guy putting crap on myspace doesn't cut it. Nor do sites that sprang up just for the sake of trashing America. There are plenty of examples of these too. You can put up a decent site for like fifty bucks. Doesn't make you an authority
Show me articles from non-moonbat sources that back up that there was all 9 hijackers found alive. You know the same guys as they have photos of. You ought to be able to match the faces. And sources like ABC, NBC, BBC, etc. Because I could by they got some names wrong or that there are other people with the same names.
You don't have to melt the steel, only weaken it. You can bend it with a simple propane torch that is about 1500 degrees. There is also debate as to how hot it would have gotten so I don't even accept your number.
16' just happens to be the size of the fuselage of a 747. All that means is by the time it got to the wings it didn't penetrate. Why would a missile cut down light poles on the way in? Also that is a pretty busy road by the Pentagon. Should be hundreds of people saying it was a missile. Should be a few soldiers in the Pentagon who just happened to look out the window at the right time. Being that I was Army, I can tell you that soldiers love their country and are brave enough to come forward with something that big.
A lot of calls were made on the air phones and the planes were low to make the hit. Quite a bit different than the studies you are going to point to.
I seriously doubt that selling it to China would be an ideal way to get rid of evidence. It would be better to melt it here where it could be monitored. Again this claim just doesn't make sense
A few firefighters said they heard explosions or what they thought were explosions. I am sure that there were many odd sounds while those towers fell.
Thermite? Show me the lab tests. I am also sure that there were odd fires. There was a big mix of stuff in the buildings.
2006-09-26 10:49:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
100' long doesn't translate to 100' wide. The hole would be 100' deep, not wide. Also, where did you get 16'?
There was no thermite dripping from the tires. Seriously, check better sources.
The evidence wasn't sold to China.
There are phones on the plane, and even if there weren't, they were at a relatively low altitude. The plane did lose some height in the takeover, and didn't regain it. Also, cell phones beam to towers. They can beam down as well as up.
And the "bombs" sound fictitious at best.
More non-MySpace sources would be great. MySpace is easily fabricated.
2006-09-26 10:03:20 · answer #3 · answered by drink_more_powerade 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
How could the masterminds of such a magnificent and complex conspiracy have possibly been so dumb as to not complete their plan by working out a simple way for weapons of mass destruction to be "found" in Iraq? If such geniuses really wanted it to "seem" like a plane hit the Pentagon, wouldn't they have found a way to make sure there was a lot more evidence that conspiracy nuts would find harder to question?
2006-09-26 10:07:56 · answer #4 · answered by Wei_Veach 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
a million- The 9 stuck did not get on their planes - no longer survivors. 2- no longer all those who had a cellular telephone said as someone - you imagine some did not paintings - that they had suncom i'm particular! 3- A janitor would understand what bombs look like - i'd not probable. in the experience that that they had had to close him up , it would not were with money. 4- It changed into loopy, bombs blowing up & gasoline leaking down flooring & igniting would look alike. 5- Did you no longer see the planes sticking out of aspects of creating. They possibly 100' lengthy yet they did not flow 100' into progression because shall we see them. 6- Did we pay the 1000's of spectators who watched the attack? this entire conspiracy element is getting previous, the theory is illogical. If the goverment would try this, why no longer only make up intel to attack Afghanistan & why do the terrorist hate us a lot. they have for generations & they continually will. Did we attack London, Canada, & try numerous different attacks?
2016-11-24 20:50:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why believe the explanations and the videos of the conspiracy theorists over those of the government, media and testimonies of those who were there that day? After all, how do we know that those conspiracy theorists are not the real conspirators? How do we know that the likes of Alex Jones are not the cynical master conspirators bent on creating chaos and anarchy? How do we know that their aim isn’t to cause the people to lose faith in their government so that they may attain their nefarious goals?
Besides if the government was going to go through all that trouble to conspire to create 9-11 don’t you think that it would have also been a good idea to plant some WMDs in Iraq?
2006-09-26 09:59:54 · answer #6 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
As a professional Firefighter your question offends me to the core. To read the critique of the events of that day, the eye witness accounts, the death counts, and the ultimate results.
How dare you? You may play politics if you wish, but many many people realize the cowardice that these stories involve.
Insults? Your allegations insult the very honor of the people that died.
Shame.
2006-09-26 10:04:17 · answer #7 · answered by Lives7 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Better yet, how did they get tens of thousands of people to think they saw, with their own eyes, those "imaginary" planes fly into the world trade center? You fail.
2006-09-26 10:05:22 · answer #8 · answered by The Resurrectionist 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
How about a nice cup of shut the **** up?
2006-09-26 10:07:59 · answer #9 · answered by ___ 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Still crazy after all your posts
2006-09-26 10:08:47 · answer #10 · answered by Not perfect, just forgiven 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋