Shouldn't we move the homeless out of the way or put then to some kind of work. Make them be of use to the society they are sucking off. By move I mean, make disappers. Wouldn't that be a better way to make parks cleaner and subway stations too?
2006-09-26 08:58:14 · 16 answers · asked by Raziel 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
So, you are going to kill off the mentally ill and addicted? Just because YOU don't want to see them?
2006-09-26 09:01:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, not far from my office, there is a homeless shelter. I have spoken to people there because my hotels donate food to them and some of us volunteer there too.
They say that the people who are homeless in the area mostly won't stay in the shelter. They come in to get food, but will not stay overnight, except when the weather is really extreme.
They also say that many of the people are mentally ill, and that they have problems being inside, and relating to others well. Some of them have homes and families, but won't go home, won't go in the shelter, and won't take their medication. It isn't that they are "sucking" off of society or anything, they are really ill. But what can we do? We can't force them in, we can't force them to work, we can't force them to go home or take their medication...unless they do anything illegal, no one can make them do anything. It is really a bad situation.
2006-09-26 16:09:47 · answer #2 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bad, bad person. Why dont you ask a homeless person to come and stay with you, then they wouldn't be homeless anymore. Give a little bit of that attitude to the helping of the homeless. I hope you never become Homeless, it is not fun. Think before you open your big mouth and think with your little brain.You are a DUMB ***.
2006-09-26 16:04:06 · answer #3 · answered by nieceofmissourifats 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We used to put them in asylums. I personally think that is the proper place for a majority of them. It at least kept them clean and fed and had people really trying to fix what was wrong. Beats just giving them welfare and letting them hurt themselves.
2006-09-26 16:02:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
sweet....war on homeless takes a new twist...I saw one hitchhiking today on my way back from lunch and the bum flipped me off when I wouldn't give him a ride. We should have enough National Guard still on domestic soil to kick some major bum *ss
2006-09-26 16:44:28 · answer #5 · answered by taterhog mung-flower 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would be more cost effective and less disruptive to turn the estates of the rich into parks and housing projects.
2006-09-26 16:01:59 · answer #6 · answered by Sincere Questioner 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
LMAO. if your going to do that, might as well get rid of half the american indians too. they just get free money from the government free houses and contribute nothing too.
(this isnt for ALL of them, just for the freeloading ones)
2006-09-26 16:02:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I suppose we can put you in an elevator that will *unexpectedly* break down an you will have to listen to there heart wrenching story of how they became that way...
A Wiccan and Proud
-Why?
2006-09-26 16:00:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We need to get them functioning as much as possible with housing, food, clothing, education. training, jobs, substance rehab, counseling, hospitalization.....whatever they need to get on their feet but they need to do their part, too.
2006-09-26 16:05:29 · answer #9 · answered by tecvba 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do not judge what you do not know or understand or would you want to be judged by your own standards.
2006-09-26 16:06:36 · answer #10 · answered by AcePrincess 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋