More Kaleo stuff. This is from a section called "Core values" which seems a little less fundamentalist than their page on doctrine.
2006-09-26 07:09:49 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Blackacre: It's not my responsibility to define words on other people's web pages. Maybe you should read the question thoroughly before attempting to answer.
2006-09-26 07:26:47 · update #1
Somewhat agree, although my definition of "god" might not be traditional.
The eternal and infinite "right now" is the time for change, my dreams have to start right now. My dreams and fantasy and knowledge are somewhat what god is about for me.
Even if it's not true, I am happy.
2006-09-26 07:12:53 · answer #1 · answered by Corey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Take a serious look at this question, and ask yourself if you are really wasting your time with this Kaleo site:
how do " nondenominationalists" , which has their own distinct theology, and often boast that they are “separated from any denomination,” obey God’s command that Christians “all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment” (1 Cor. 1:10)?
Here is a site more worthy of your intelligence:
http://www.phatmass.com/
2006-09-26 14:15:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Agree
2006-09-26 14:10:35 · answer #3 · answered by riettebotha2 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Disagree.
Merely because God is eternal does not mean that He gives meaning to any age,culture or world view.
Tell me how God gave meaning to the Khemer Rouge in Cambodia or to the Nazis in Germany.
Those world views gave meaning to the word genocide and God had nothing to do with it.
The age,culture and world view must first give meaning to God.Without that they merely become another has-been in the annals of history.
Then men of the future give them some meaning or they merely vanish.
2006-09-26 14:18:37 · answer #4 · answered by Den 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Disagree
2006-09-26 14:11:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You must first define "God". If you mean the concept of a supernatural creator, then I would disagree. If you mean a conceptual answer for the unknown which is gradually chipped away by advances in knowledge, then I might agree.
Before that, though, you might also have to define "meaning"
Otherwise, one is simply labeling ignorance "God".
2006-09-26 14:10:56 · answer #6 · answered by Blackacre 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Agree.
2006-09-26 14:10:57 · answer #7 · answered by Shawn_small 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In my own personal beliefs, I totally agree.
2006-09-26 14:15:18 · answer #8 · answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Times change but God does not change.
2006-09-26 14:12:53 · answer #9 · answered by Steve P 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
History does happen Everything going on is being allowed by Him for a purpose yet to be fulfilled
2006-09-26 14:12:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋