English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Members of the panel will offer their assessment of the secret information acquired to justify the raid. The Muslim panel will evaluate the consequences of the proposed raid and its impact to the local community and civic relations as a whole.
So sensitivity panels decide who and when police conduct a raid? Who else gets a panel to decide if a raid is warranted? a Judge used to decide this. Has Britain established Sharia law zones inside the country?

"Times of London"



What do you think?

2006-09-26 05:52:25 · 6 answers · asked by Gone Rogue 7 in Politics & Government Civic Participation

6 answers

It's high time the police involved civilian groups in their processes. Dealers should be consulted about drugs busts. Pimps should be consulted about whore house raids. Embezzlers should be consulted about the activities of the Fraud Squad. It's important to develop dialogue with these and other minority groups so as not to alienate and offend them.

2006-09-26 06:01:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Policies like that will get a lot of Londoners killed. At some point a mushroom cloud is going to rise above a Western city and then all this P.C. crap is going out the window. Then we can really start waging war against the Islamic death cult.

2006-09-26 06:01:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Raja looted funds at centre and invested it in Karunanidhi's channel. Karunanidhi looted state and gave unfastened TVs to BPL so as that they watch his channel and develop its TRP. Thats an clever concept of this previous guy i'm fairly taken aback to work out that between the clientele named India Inc. has praised congress and referred to as them the only credible ruler. Mr India Inc. with utmost appreciate i might want to ask a pair of inquiries to u : a million) Is there any u . s . different than india the place the PM does not have any say in choosing his cabinet and while any of his ministers take decision, the PM remains clean on the undertaking yet nonetheless runs his u . s . ? 2) Is there any u . s . different than india the place the PM fails to quit massive scams which take place suitable under his nostril yet needs clean chit from his voters ?

2016-10-18 00:25:54 · answer #3 · answered by lorentz 4 · 0 0

Well the UK is screwed, why have a non-governmental body do this unless its a trap to set them up for their terror ties.

2006-09-26 06:00:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

It is one way to make sure no Muslim gets arrested.

How about Yorkshire attacks on girls this is bad.
http://www.bnp.org.uk/news_detail.php?newsId=1153

2006-09-26 05:58:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

this is retarded, might as well ask one criminal if its ok to bust another.

2006-09-26 05:56:55 · answer #6 · answered by moolie_wfo 5 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers