English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

31 answers

If the girl is going to "put-out", then no, she doesn't need to chip in. If she's going to hoarde that cooter, then she should pay for the entire dinner/date.

2006-09-26 03:21:27 · answer #1 · answered by New Rider of the purple sage 3 · 1 1

Well, sometimes, but there are guys out there are that are still gentlemen and pay for dates. I personally offer to chip in most of the time, but its always nice to have a guy that every once in a while WANTS (or acts like he does) to treat the woman to an old fashioned date. All women like that so men... listen up!!

2006-09-26 10:29:19 · answer #2 · answered by slickpam 2 · 0 0

Well if you are independent it wouldn't hurt to chip in. It depends on what type of guy he is. Is he more modern or old fashion? Does it bother him for you to chip in? I chip in at times. Its always good to surprise your bf. If he takes you out and pays all the time. This time invite him and pay. It will probably turn him on. But don't let him get used to it. Men get too comfortable. Do it with style.

2006-09-26 10:28:20 · answer #3 · answered by ourfuturein123 2 · 0 0

No. The girl should offer but the guy should not accept. After a few months of dating the girl should chip in when she feels like it. If you are dating a guy and he expects you to pay, find a new guy.

2006-09-26 10:21:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

There is nothing more I hate than picking up a tab for a dinner date and not "getting" anything in return. Now, what I do if I sense this is actually going to lead to a 2nd date then maybe I'll pay. The dates that I've spent the night with were the ones who paid for everything.

2006-09-26 10:23:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

If the man is a man, he should pay. Don't go out with men who can't afford to date. In today's world, I think the equality thing (men vs women) has gone a little over board. Once the relationship is established and you both want to more out of life then sharing the cost of dinner should not be an issue.

2006-09-26 10:30:33 · answer #6 · answered by Ron G 2 · 0 1

Yes i think a girl should also chip in.Why shouldnt we? It actually makes me feel better about myself knowing that i dont need to depend on a man for every little thing. Money isnt a big deal to me. Sharing is caring.

2006-09-26 10:23:05 · answer #7 · answered by michelle 5 · 1 0

the right thing to do, is to let the guy know that you dont have a problem chipping in if he wants or needs you to. for example, eating out, the bill comes, you reach for your money ready to chip in (and be ready in case he accepts) but he'll most likely wave off your offer (if he's a gentleman). but it'll make him feel better knowing that you EXPECTED to help out with the bill. its the polite thing to do.

2006-09-26 10:25:00 · answer #8 · answered by nicekitty_meeooww 2 · 0 0

It depends if its the start of the relationship or if its been going on for awhile. Or just on what type of person you are. I always AT LEAST offer to pay for something say we go to dinner and a movie, then I would offer to pay for at least the meal or the movie. Some guys don't want you to pay for anything, and if thats the case, then thats ok for me. But some girls don't want the guy to pay for everything but they feel as though he might want sex in return. It is up to you and your guy, so GOOD LUCK!!!!

2006-09-26 10:24:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think most relationships these days are 50/50...if both people are working hard for there money...why shouldn't you share some of the costs? I think it's unrealistic to expect a guy to pick up the tab every time.

2006-09-26 10:23:36 · answer #10 · answered by aak 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers