2006-09-25 23:41:28 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
NO. As a leader he has made mostly wrong decisions. Morally he is a complete failure.
2006-09-25 23:46:59 · answer #1 · answered by industrialconfusion 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes he is a good man in a very tough job. Just ask his predecessors. You may not agree with the stand he has taken but he did not waffle, he did not run from the problem and he did his best to protect this country. I know that if Gore had been president on 9/11 he would have said to find the guys who thought it up and arrest them, just like Clinton did on previous attacks. What happened, we had more attacks. With George Bush in office we have not been attacked since then. The radical Muslims know we will strike back and strike back hard. They want a democrat in office it gives them the freedom to harm us.
2006-09-26 07:06:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, that all depends who you ask. For example, if you were to ask 90% of the population of the rest of the world, then the answer would be a resounding NO! And that figure in not limited to our "enemies", or to Muslim nations, but to the majority of our allies in "The War on Terror"-the war without boundaries, the war without end. George has not made too many friends around the world.A lot of this has to do with his unpopular war in Iraq and the daily devastation seen on the news around the globe, his total disregard for the rights and opinions of other nations, his unilateral approach to world affairs, etc.
However, if you ask the 37-43% of Americans who still approve of this man, then they will likely tell you he is a "good guy". Starting in 1933 and even until the fall of Berlin in 1945, most Germans thought Adolph Hitler was a great guy. It's really all very subjective.
2006-09-26 06:53:01 · answer #3 · answered by Samuel Crow 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
1. Huge federal deficits
2. Mismanagement
3. Deception
4. Failed Economy
Bush has been a huge disappointment to the U.S. from the day he took office. The American public has suffered through an administration that is self serving and deceitful. You ask what's the point? The point is that we've had our fill of the inept Bush administration and we're tired of the lies.
2006-09-26 07:28:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.
I notice the comment "he doesn't back down" right, he's surrounded him self with a group of yes men/women so bad decisions are never corrected. Nobody can get it right every time but he's the type of leader who will not have anyone around that tells him the facts. They can only tell him what a great job he's doing.
This is compounded by the problem he's not that bright and it appears know little history so guess what, he's doomed to repeat any mistakes of the past.
2006-09-26 06:58:59 · answer #5 · answered by madjer21755 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Killing our soldiers for his families wealth is good? Fighting Iraqi people for oil is good? Allowing our National Guard to fight overseas is good? They are the "National Guard." What does the word National mean to you? What happened to the war in Afghanistan? That is where our enemy was and is. That is where 9/11 was generated, not Iraq. Bush knew that going in. Daddy Bush vowed to get even with Saddam during the Gulf War and he did it with his idiot son. Need I say more?
2006-09-26 06:57:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
no. why? because, and i should point out here that i'm an atheist, for a man who preaches about the evils of religious extremists, he seems to inflict his brand of it upon the whole world. Why is a christian extremist not regarded with the same hate as a muslim extremist? because he got in first.
I have no sympathy for the people who commit terrorist atrocities, you can never rationalise the killing of innocent people, but similarly I have no respect for the people who have committed themselves to genocide in the past and now condemn people committing far lesser evils. I repeat I don't condone terrorism, and those who feel the usa are this great defender of the world's rights should open their eyes, and maybe read a little chomsky or something. (This is one hell of a can of worms you've opened up here!)
2006-09-26 06:51:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
very simple because he is legally and morally and systematically do all the work and beyond the system eticks and rule he can never take steps as I know so he is a nice person and no charge is proove against him. Any one proove wrong to any person diplomaticallly but that is wrong
2006-09-27 03:22:54 · answer #8 · answered by name of spritual tantra horr0r 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In a religious perspective, no, because he's a blatent liar, a misguiding force, a promoter of hatred, an obsessor of money, an indirect killer, and so on.. but this is to be expected at the top of the food chain. Politics revolves around money, not peace, and definitely not truth. Peace.
2006-09-26 06:51:25 · answer #9 · answered by A Casual Savage 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
NO.
1. he considers peace tobe obtained through tip of guns. better to seek for peace through peace. step 1 is this. force should not be as an option; unless ...
2. he considers that his country's benefit could be secured at the expense of other countries. but the right approach is a wn-win; it is wise not to be smart considering others the otherway.
2006-09-26 06:53:33 · answer #10 · answered by Mesfin Y 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm sure he's a fine person. He seems to be down to Earth.
However, he's a lousy President, and I literally have 3 online countdown timers saved in my Favorites menu which show EXACTLY how long it is until the next President is sworn into office.
He doesn't do his job well. But to all Americans, all we know him for IS his job, so we can't personally measure him. We have to measure him as a leader.
2006-09-26 06:48:22 · answer #11 · answered by amg503 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋