2006-09-25 23:32:13 · 19 answers · asked by woo 5 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
Klose is a better finisher (duh, that's why he plays as a striker), with deadly header and good long range shot. He has ok distribution, but not the top among the strikers.
Ballack is a central midfielder who runs box-to-box. He has accurate long range passes as well as short passes. He can hit freekick, take corners, and hit headers. His defensive ability, such as tackles, clears, and headings are excellent as well.
In terms of dribbling, they are at the same level. I mean, Germans aren't known for fancy dribbles. The best of Germans right now is probably Odonkor....
Anyway, I will say Ballack is more talented and diverse. But Klose is a better finisher.
They kinda remind me of the old Mattaeus/Klinsmann combo.
2006-09-26 10:22:29 · answer #1 · answered by tienyutai 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Though we find Klose as the Best player for this World Cup, ballack exceeds him in many characteristics.. Klose is a striker.. His job is just to push in the ball which Ballack is pulling in from the opposite half..
So i feel ballack is good
2006-09-25 23:43:40 · answer #2 · answered by vijayanP P 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
MIchael Ballack
2006-09-26 09:11:57 · answer #3 · answered by Naty:Co-Emperor Has Returned 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmm.. well they do play in different positions but I think Ballack is a more well-rounded player than Klose. Ballack is more versatile, he's plays well in the midfield as well as defense but he's also good at scoring goals too.
2006-09-26 06:22:23 · answer #4 · answered by Ash 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ballack has more experience than klose but ballack is kind of old and plays a slow game than klose.....i would choose ballack
2006-09-25 23:43:30 · answer #5 · answered by The dude 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ballack.
2006-09-25 23:43:10 · answer #6 · answered by ?????????? 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Klose is a rising sun,his best is 2 come yet!
But BALLACK is 'course better,he's more experienced!!!
BTW i love his(Ballack's) killer blue eyes!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-09-25 23:38:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
They are both great player though at different category and era.
Ballack may be well known but Klose do the dirty job and get score
2006-09-25 23:42:43 · answer #8 · answered by domule 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
His presence would've made no distinction. Germany works because it really is determined by a gadget, no longer on the participant. Plus, he has elderly and isn't any longer a participant who drives ahead. Bastian Schweinsteiger, a organic attacking participant, has proved more beneficial than able contained in the German holding midfield function and Sami Khedira has shown very risky in his moves off the ball. The German squad is youthful, works problematic and is completed of power.
2016-11-24 19:48:16 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
MICHAEL BECAUSE KLOSE IS JUST A YOUNGSTER AND HE IS YE T TO PROVE HIMSELF 100% . HE ONLY PLAY AWES IN WCUP . SEE TILL BOW NO CLUB HAS SELECTED HIM AND BALLACK IS A PROVED PLAYER.
2006-09-26 22:54:24 · answer #10 · answered by tourist 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋