He was pretty impressive on FOX. There's no quite like him with a gift for words. Put him anywhere, he'll ease himself into the surroundings.
2006-09-25 23:02:38 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Some of you are missing the point, all I'm saying is that he is an articulate speaker. Very few people can take an ambush like that and turn the tables. Whether you like the man or not, you must marvel at the way he work an audience, his command and composure under pressure.
One thing I did like was he saying he won't directly criticise President Bush. I think personal attacks by former Presidents are way out of order and nice to see that Bill maintaining some Presidential dignity.
You may not like the guy, but he was the 42nd President, a successful one at that. Every President from whatever party needs to be accorded respect. I support Bush but I wouldn't descend into mudslinging Clinton.
Hillary maybe but not Bill.
2006-09-26 04:32:36 · update #1
Definitely. Especially in the face of that cheap attack by Fox. Wallace is such a weasel. Any decent reporter would have lost their job over that, but a propagandist like what he's become just gets a pat on the back.
2006-09-26 01:05:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
He is such an intelligent man. I am really proud of him for standing his ground and throughly answering Wallace's out-of-line question. I think the interview has started an unintentional but very necessary political firestorm-I think he has shown the Democrats to fight back. I am very excited to see what happens next. And to those who continue to fall back on the ol' scandal, open your eyes-you have a man in office who has lied repeatedly, is a stupid-yet-condescending (what a combination) and is endangering us. Oh wait, the stupid part-that must be what appeals to you. Wouldn't want a person with a brain in office, would we?
2006-09-26 07:48:12 · answer #2 · answered by nunya 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes, and for this reason and so many others.. George W. Bush is the anti- Bill Clinton.
2006-09-26 06:11:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Clinton is without a doubt a political powerhouse. His knowledge of the true facts and brilliant communication skills left Wallace looking like a deer caught in headlights. It was like watching Mohammad Ali destroy an amateur who mistakenly thought he could take on the champ. I don't blame him for being angry. Wallace took a cheap shot and is now feigning innocence. I don't buy it for one minute.
2006-09-26 06:42:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Loved it when he pointed his finger in Wallaces face. Reminded me of when he pointed it at the camera and said "I did not have sex with that woman" He could have at least used her name instead of calling her THAT WOMAN . He said he was waiting for Clarence from the Justice Dept to get Osama, but the Federal Court had already indited him That gave him all the clearance he needed. Not only does he lie, he showed that he does not even care about a women he had sex with, enough to use her name. Great guy ole' Billy Bob.
2006-09-26 07:18:07 · answer #5 · answered by mark g 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
You said it all "mudmarine".
I agree 100%, he acts like a little child every time he gets caught lying.
2006-09-26 08:19:29 · answer #6 · answered by usaf.primebeef 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, unlike the current president he can think and talk at the same time.
2006-09-26 06:07:22 · answer #7 · answered by industrialconfusion 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
You bet !! he can lie out of both sides of his mouth and his butt at the same time .
Everytime he's been caught in a lie , he's pulled the indignant outrage routine .
I DID NOT HAVE SEX WITH THAT WOMAN !!!
2006-09-26 06:32:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No offense! He talks much better when someone else is
between his legs.
2006-09-26 06:34:13 · answer #9 · answered by Teh halia 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yea dude , no one can choose the words and lie like him !! may be Bush can ,,, but still Bush is an idiot , he was smarter !!
2006-09-26 06:21:05 · answer #10 · answered by Bee 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋