Muslims are treated with suspicion in some cases, but that is to do with the very real threat of extremism. I don't know if there was ever such thing as an extreme Jew, also the political situation is totally different so I don't think your analogy works.
If you are inferring that there will ever be a genocide against Muslims in a country like Britain then you are very wrong. There is more likely to be a genocide against certain types of Muslims by different Muslims in a Muslim country.
2006-09-25 23:06:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, it quite is occurring yet won't be able to be solved by wrecking the financial equipment. There could be a distinctive set of agreements than any of those provided. international places mutually with China, Brazil, South Africa, India and others could additionally connect up as they are the two in charge. What the West did interior the previous to the ecosystem become incorrect yet China is the worst polluter. They even dip toys in lead. i've got faith in evolution yet do no longer dispute the sacredness of those books different than i do no longer evaluate the Qur'an to be sacred, nevertheless i'm against prejudice in direction of Muslims. Zealotry is a distinctive situation and has been a undertaking in Christianity and Islam. distinctive religions produce distinctive effects extra with the aid of management and rules than the books. Canonical regulation is a foul concept. So is shari'a. The advocacy of reform in evangelical Christianity and Islam isn't incorrect. It ought to be performed. that is not prejudice to ask questions concerning to the non secular suitable and to criticize and demand substitute. %. and fanatical rhetoric get interior the way of clean thinking. Paganism and Druidism are purely New Age vogue tendencies that propose no longer something and not properly worth pondering.
2016-10-18 00:02:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hardly believe it can go as far as a genocide, but they are already restricted in countries you wouldn't expect: France, Germany, and even more surprisingly Turkey banned headscarf wearing in public buildings. They could have told as well "we're not allowing Muslim girls to be educated". Otherwise officially Muslims are treated normally, although they are monitored better than non-Muslims.
As for the people, I think they have less prejudices against Muslims than they had against Jews, even if Yahoo Answers shows a different picture of this.
2006-09-25 23:43:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Oh don't be ridiculous. They were not "regarded with suspicion and discriminated against everywhere.'' For crying out loud, the officer who recommended Hitler for his Iron Cross was a Jew. The Jews were part of the fabric of European civilisation and if individual Jews were the subject of prejudice and bigotry, it was just that, prejudice and bigotry founded on nothing whereas the suspicion directed against Muslims is born of the fear that they want to murder everybody else.
2006-09-25 23:09:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by scotsman 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
The difference was that the Jews of Hitlers time was a kind loving nation who did not blow things up and kill thousands of innocent people like the so called Muslims of today's times. As long as the Muslim people of today's times hide the terrorists they will be viewed with suspicion. They need to tell police where these so called Muslims are living and what they are doing not hiding them.
2006-09-25 23:01:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Future boy 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
No. Muslims could never take the place of the Jewish society. Muslims come from the line of Ishmael which God said would always raise their swords against the Nation of Israel. The suicide bombings we see everyday is prophecy coming true that was predicted thousands of years ago.
2006-09-26 04:27:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Delta Charlie 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
That's a stupid comparison, the jews didnt go blowing other people up in europe, the muslims have brought it (suspicion) upon themselves.
2006-09-25 23:09:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Let's see what Jews and Arab Muslims have in common :
Their religions derived in the Middle East.
They don't eat pork.
They bleed animals to death to make them fit to eat.
They think circumcision is a good idea.
They are Semites.
for another view have a look at this :
http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5260670-105806,00.html
2006-09-25 23:35:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by enirgo 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
although that is true, i don't think there was a group of jews that used to respond to accusations of being violent by screaming 'no we aren't' whilst trying to damage anything and anybody that might be in their way at the time.
thats not a fair comparison.
2006-09-25 23:01:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
No, just a pain in the neck.
2006-09-26 08:19:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Veritas 7
·
1⤊
0⤋