how does socialism differ from communism?

Question

I know that communism is more extreme but I'm not sure what the exact specifics are and what their positions are more extreme about particularly.

Answer 1

Well I can give you a rough difference but some links that can give you a lot more detail are below.

Communism is the natural progression of socialism. As socialism progresses in a government at some point it collapses from its own weight. In essence the system has taken so much from those who have earned it and given it to those who have not that there becomes a consistent shortfall or deficit, sort of like the US today. After the deficit reaches alarming amounts the government will begin to take control of the means of production so it can cover the deficits since it is still "giving" money it does not own away. As this progresses farther some of those who own means of production beging to fight back, then the government has the "national police" start fighting back and you have your communist takeover of the US.

It really is quite simple, people need to help each other, not the government. You see the people have the money and the means of production and are bascially good. The government has to steal money from those who produce to "help" people but really it is not help that is given it is dependence. So you can see socialism fails, always and finitely, not a matter of if, just when.

The first link has a lot in common with the democratic party agenda and is a must read for anyone who doubts where we are being led

Answer 2

I would say that socialism can co-exist with a limited free market--not one out of control, but not one completely controlled by a government. Also, the main features of socialism are universal health care and a government that is willing to maintain infrastructure and other services for the community. Communism and a market-based economy, on the other hand, cannot co-exist.

In some ways, FDR's New Deal was socialist in nature. Also, the province of Saskatchewan in Canada was the first place in North America to elect a socialist-style government, I believe. In both cases, there was no dismantling of the free market, but government assistance and social programs were ubiquitous.

Answer 3

In theory they do determination, and at one time they did. yet in view that both one among those political philosophies are "little ones" of Marx and Engels, Socialism because it develops will change into more beneficial Absolute in its prepare, for this reason morphing into Communism. Socialism, through theory, is meant to be gadget in which a advanced (commercial) us of a nonetheless enables and encourages deepest resources and its use, yet those issues in society which at the prompt are not provided through the marketplace are performed so through the state. many times with the help of heavy taxation of the non-public and company sector that produces the different products and amenities. Communism, on the different hand is the "state" owns each and every thing, mutually with the technique of production and distribution or maybe your resources (i.e., domicile). It also makes a call what's produced, even as, the position, how and how a lot is produced, quite than letting those who make the most of or "eat" this stuff to finish that. regrettably human beings in cost "Love" being in cost and Socialist initiate to imagine they're the in worry-free words ones with the knowledge to finish that and trust they understand more beneficial positive than you do at what's significant and what's no longer. So, Socialist have a tendency to take further and extra administration of the each day lives of those less than their cost in an attempt to deliver society into their personal inventive and prescient of what the state or society should be. it really is in worry-free words one reason the structures do no longer paintings. the different significant situation is that with anybody operating for the "state", both right away or through taxation, they get rid of the favor or stress to do a strong interest or strengthen for that remember. The recommendations set seems, "Why ought to I paintings flat out? I nonetheless get a similar reward if I do or i do not." mockingly it really is the different effect of what the Socialist change into hoping to attain (in theory) interior the first position.

Answer 4

As far as political science is concerned there is no such thing as Communism... Communism is a term that was invented to name a political party not a system of government. So the answer to your question is this... calling communism a system of government is alot like calling Republican a system of government. For the record Socialism was invented by Karl Marx who origionally called it Marxism.
Oh and the definition for a Socialist society all comes down to 1 thing .. The "Material powers of production" are owned by the state. Any nation that has that is a Socialist nation.

Answer 5

I've heard some theoretical differences suggested, for example that socialism says, "From each according to his/her ability; to each according to his/her work (labor)", while communism says, "From each according to his/her labor; to each according to his/her needs." Or that communist believe in state ownership of *all* the means of production, while socialists only believe in state ownership of the 'commanding heights' of the economy. But I don't think those distinctions are correct.

In most situations, they're two different words for the same thing (although no one can agree on exactly what that 'thing' is or should be). Remember that 'communist' Russia used to call itself the USSR: the Union of Soviet *Socialist* Republics.

Right-wing critics prefer to label left wingers as 'communists' because it makes them sound more extreme.

Similarly, some left wingers prefer to call themselves 'socialists', so as not to sound to scary.

It all gets far more complicated because left wingers love to argue among themselves, and divide up into smaller and smaller groups, who will then come up with sometimes misleading names for themselves (and insults for the others).

If you're writing any kind of paper on the subject, I suggest you avoid labelling any group, state or system as 'communist as opposed to socialist', or vice versa. It's probably best to stick to the word 'socialist', except where the word 'communist' is used in the official title of a party or other organisation.

Answer 6

Socialism has private business, varying wages, etc, while communism is everyone shares everything equally. Noone has more money than anyone else.

Anyone heard of Carl Marx? Communism is the utopian theory of Carl Marx's that he said couldn't work because of human greed.