Will simply leaving Iraq solve the problem?

Question

Now, huge number of the Americans are eager to get over with this bloody situation with Iraq.

They say bring our troops back home.

Do you think just simply leaving Iraq now will solve the problem? Or will it create more problems?

Why is leaving Iraq right now good or not good?

What do we need to accomplish in order to bring our troops home?

Answer 1

Not really. I not a supporter of the war but I think that leaving now will create more problems. I realize that the Iraqis in general don't want us to be in their country, but if we left now there would be a good chance that civil war would break out in Iraq. People might say that that is not our problem, but I think being responsible of civil war and/or civil unrest is our problem. We have to do the best we can to establish a good reputation with other counties. We have to be responsible and maintain the fight against the insurgents until we can be sure that the goverment of Iraq can sustain itself and defend Iraq and protect the Iraqis.

Answer 2

No war is good! It hurts, it destroys. The very lives of ppl, animals, children. It hurts education, industry, commerce. It is NOT good.

While I'll be the first to say we should bring our troops home, considering how unstable the entire mid-east region has been, historically, I doubt bringing that will solve anything. We may not hear from the rulers and kings right away but we will. There will be "in-fights" and coups and possible insurrections from within. All of these things will impact on our WORLD economy in the way of oil costs. We are ALL dependent on the black gold and unsolved problems will eventually filter out and trickle down.

I am all for trading troops on the ground for bombers in the sky. Not many terrorists have planes or missiles so, as the song says; can't touch this!

Answer 3

If they don't have a hidden agenda , yes they should leave Iraq but only after instating order by training the police forces and starting an Iraqi army with weapons for protection .........against the insurgents . The new army should be mobilized and used in the country to guard against the greedy factions on the ground .
There is a battle for power , for oil . The tremendous riches of that country are enticing , If the US forces stay there , they won't accomplish anything .....and will only be depicted as the aggressor and invader .

Answer 4

If you take a wrong turn down a road and get lost what do you do?
You realize you made a mistake and you go back the way you can. People make mistakes. But only the people in the White House are so arrogent that they wont admit they made a mistake and wont turn back. The reason is simple. EGOs. If they leave Iraq, that will be admitting it was a huge mistake.
Stay or leave, the result is going to be the same.....civil war.
The difference is that if we leave, our soldiers wont be the ones getting killed, and we wont be spending billions of dollars on a war that should never have been started in the first place.

Answer 5

Yes , it will because 1st of all its obvious that they dont want us there 2nd we dont want to be there our troops are being killed so bush can profit from oil
oil is not more expensive than our boys's blood
and also where is all that mass destruction weapons they have been talking about , all of these are lies
we should bring them back now
the Iraqies have elected their goverment and they are starting over so what the hell are we doing there .

Answer 6

hard inquiries to respond to. I hear from pals who've relatives individuals over there contained in the military that say issues are turning out to be better effective in some recommendations and worse in others. to go away Iraq at present may in some recommendations be reliable contained in the couple of minutes period yet per chance no longer contained in the lengthy run. the unique objective changed into to eliminate Saddam which we did and then help the human beings there set up there own Democratic authorities. one which has loose elections and a reliable structure that covers anybody no remember what their ethnic historic past is. yet from watching the in battling between the a number of tribes i do not comprehend in the adventure that they receives previous that sufficient to stay at the same time in a loose society. you could lead a horse to water yet you could not make him drink. yet no matter if it truly is valuable that is going to likely be an incredible victory for the global. we do not opt to dominate or triumph over Iraq or everywhere else merely help them to be a loose human beings run by regulations that all of them agree on and vote for. no longer having to stay in concern of a dictator who would have you ever killed merely because he would not like the way you walk or something. yet is their freedom no matter if it truly is valuable going to capture on over there? Are we taking too vast a probability putting our adult women and men human beings in harms way contained in the hopes that democracy and man or woman freedom wins over terrorism? i imagine we ought to win the warfare on terrorism. i'm merely no longer particular if we are going about it contained in the right way. Sorry yet I truly don't have any absolute solutions for your questions as I truly have the same ones myself. In some recommendations I trust Bush and on some issues I disagree. yet i imagine he's an user-friendly guy doing a frustrating job in stricken situations. So I pray plenty. lol

Answer 7

for some time yes