English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-25 19:42:49 · 17 answers · asked by memolino2007@sbcglobal.net 2 in News & Events Current Events

17 answers

If there is military action in Iran to take out the nuclear facilties it is not likely to be done with ground troops. It is more likely to be B-2 bombers with ammonium nitride bunker buster bombs and missiles from submarines. It would likely be done with support from NATO allies.

The highest official in the Islamic Republic of Iran is Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei who is appointed for life just as Ayatollah Khomenei was. That is why Iran is a constitutional theocracy. Ayatollah Khamenei, according to Iran's constitution is the commander-in-chief of the military. (That makes President Ahmadi-Nejad more of a spokesperson than a real world leader.)

The preamble of Iran's constitution states, "The Assembly of Experts...fram[ed] the Constitution...[after input] by the government...with the hope that this century will witness the establishment of a universal holy government and the downfall of all others."

One of the goals of Ayatollah Khamenei is the foundation of a Shiite Islamic khalifah from Iran to Lebanon and then the extablishment of the "universal holy government".

2006-09-26 14:51:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Iran is a nation that is already attacking us. They have been since 1979 when they started to place their people in other countries to take us down. Iran does'nt want to be our friend, they don't even want to be our enemy. They just want to obliterate us along with any nation that is free. Whether we want to admit it or not, these muslim nations export violence all over the earth and it's just a matter of time before the whole world will have to decide to either fight them or embrace them. That's the only choices we have. Even the muslims will tell you that. And if you think I'm full of hot air, just look to your closest history book and see how the spread of Islam took place,.. and how it took place,...with the sword. And if you ask about the crusades and how the Christians were killing them then my answer to that is yes we did kill muslims because the muslims were slaughtering the Christians by the millions. The crusades happened because the muslims were invading Christian nations and forcing them to convert or die. It is happening now as we speak. We have to do something or else we'll be bowing toward Mecca three times a day.

2006-09-26 03:02:24 · answer #2 · answered by RIDLEY 6 · 0 0

First of all, we ain't gonna invade Iran. Reason being:
- Iraq and Afghanistan is still keeping us too preoccupied;
- we don't have that kind of manpower to handle that.

Secondly, hell already (in a way) broke loose after Sept 11.

Thirdly (in my opinion), people already seems to expect the Bush administration to send troops to Iran, so no one should be surprised if it does happen in the next 2 years.

2006-09-26 02:56:47 · answer #3 · answered by CuriousE 3 · 1 0

Where have you been? All hell broke loose after 9/11 5 years ago

2006-09-26 02:45:14 · answer #4 · answered by whidd2003 4 · 2 0

All hell is already breaking out because of other choices Bush has made.

2006-09-26 02:51:16 · answer #5 · answered by ianc555 4 · 0 1

Probably bush is making to many people mad and they are all going to get together and gang up on us. I say if are leaders have problems with each other they should just get in a boxing ring and duke it out. Leave us out of it.

2006-09-26 02:46:29 · answer #6 · answered by SarinaAnn 4 · 1 1

All hell has already broken loose, I don't know if you watch the news. I don't even live in the states, and I'm scared.

2006-09-26 02:45:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

yes. I think that all hell would break lose in America, first. Expect a revolution if that happens.

2006-09-26 02:44:40 · answer #8 · answered by wolfgangmeyers 2 · 0 1

Maybe not but all ignorance will break loose.

2006-09-26 03:35:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It is much more likely that he would order air strikes against nuclear facilities.

2006-09-26 03:03:13 · answer #10 · answered by composertype 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers