English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Someone is convicted of a crime and serving the sentence but gets accused doing another criminal activities while in prison and presume to be guilty of that crime without proper investigation. Would this person need a federal appointed public attorney to represent him, if not, what can be done....

2006-09-25 17:24:00 · 3 answers · asked by sonny 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

3 answers

Sonny, maybe I am missing your point but if I understand your question...

All people in the US charged with a crime are, by law, entitled to legal representation; even if they are currently imprisoned. Presumption of guilt does not relieve the government from the constitutional based understanding that a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty. I am not a legal expert but it would seem practical that the person would be provided a federally appointed lawyer if they don't hire their own private attorney. I have to tell you, I have never heard of a federal public defender but people charged with federal crimes need representation too.

Sorry, but that's the best I've got for you.

2006-09-25 19:28:48 · answer #1 · answered by iraq51 7 · 0 0

The answer already posted is quite accurate. One additional comment is that the imprisoned person, if formally accused of another crime, will eventually be brought to court and arraigned. At that time the accused may bring up the subject matter of how they can obtain representation.

2006-09-25 22:30:11 · answer #2 · answered by nothing 6 · 0 0

AUSTIN, Texas --A checklist by using the final financial officer of Texas claims unlawful immigrants are greater a boon to the Lone celebrity State's financial device than a drain, including yet another layer to the immigration reform debate. Comptroller Carole Keeton Strayhorn got here across that unlawful immigrants no longer in trouble-free terms contributed greater desirable than $17 billion to the state's financial device in the final financial 12 months, yet that in addition they pay greater desirable than adequate in taxes and expenditures to cover the centers they get carry of. Strayhorn's checklist mentioned they further $17.7 billion to the gross state product in financial 12 months 2005 and produced $a million.fifty 8 billion in sales by using paying taxes and expenditures and by using enjoying the lottery. "If by some ability those people have been to be bused back homestead the next day, our financial device could cut back by using some 17 billion money and that's undesirable information for each Texan and each employer in the state," he mentioned. And it is barely in Texas!

2016-12-12 15:14:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers