They were all gainfully employed by saddam insane torturing people you panty waste.
2006-09-25 16:10:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
That's because there were no terrorists (zero - nada - as confirmed by the Republican Congress' report on pre-war intelligence) in Iraq before Bush put his stupid idea into action,. Also zero ties to Al Qhaida or any terrorist organizations. If fact, they note that Saddam hated AQ before we did.
This also agrees with the recent report of America's 16 intelligence agencies, who unanimously agree that Bush's immoral and illegal invasion of Iraq has made the war on terror worse and is providing an entire new generation reason to hate us,
Bush business successes = zero
Bush military successes = 0
Bin-Laden = don't get = 0
weight of Bush's brain (units irrelevant because value) = 0
Bush = zero (he really makes it too easy)
2006-09-25 16:20:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
First of all why ask a question when you have an answer already. Second, I prefer they suicide bomb in Iraq, because when it starts happening here (and it will, war or no war) you will probably be the first to start bitching about how the government is not doing enough to keep you safe.
2006-09-25 16:12:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by takeashot30 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
None
Yes, more terrorists are being created, because none of the government or CIA responsible for the terrorism of 9/11 have yet been brought to justice, but they have alienated so many others who were previously peaceful, that more terrorism occurs.
One very significant point is the depleted uranium in Iraq.
The radiation from the DU shells is causing so much pain and anguish to Iraqis that many of them know they are doomed to die from the cancers thy have caught from the radiation.
So, in order to get rid of the pain, they don't mind killing themselves, and may as well take some of those whom they see responsible with them.
This is why there are so many suicide bombers - because so many people are affected by radiation from the DU weapons, including American soldiers.
Depleted uranium video
http://elequity.com/du/DU.swf
Depleted Uranium - Far Worse Than 9/11
For hundreds of years to come, the effects of the uranium will continue to wreak ... "American forces admit to using over 300 tons of DU weapons in 1991. ...
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20060503&articleId=2374
2006-09-26 23:18:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Now what a silly question. Of course there weren't suicide bombings before the war. There weren't any American troops there to blow up. Hello! And if you're going to ask a question, better to not answer it yourself if you want any real answers. I think you just wanted to make a point and get attention.
2006-09-25 16:12:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
That's really not a fair comparison.
They had schools and bridges and electricity and clean water and jobs before Bushie's war.
Why would they suicide bomb then?
Oh, I get it. That's what ur talkin bout.
2006-09-25 16:12:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by imnogeniusbutt 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Saddam wouldn't allow suicide bombings anybody caught killing themselves would be killed. LOL
2006-09-25 16:13:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no need for them. Saddam and the boys killed without worrying about reprisals.
2006-09-25 16:10:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Then Dubya "resolved" that
2006-09-25 17:33:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mysterio 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
lets see, Z E R O !!!!!!!!
2006-09-25 16:29:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋