English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Everyone's been talking about them running in '08. Hypothetically, who'll win and why?

2006-09-25 15:30:09 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

17 answers

That the Tv talking heads.... Hypothetically however? Dr. Rice far and away. Hillary has too much baggage & too little skill for the job. Other than ride Bill's name & coattails for 25 years she done very little. Dr. Rice has real experience, has had to be a diplomat & a Dept. secretary. She got there the hard way. However she not running. She has turn downed the offer many times. Hillary Has zero cross voter appeal & even the Yahoo! Libs here don't like her.

2006-09-25 15:47:28 · answer #1 · answered by lana_sands 7 · 0 0

Condi does no longer get the nomination with the aid of fact she isn't a profession baby-kisser. perhaps she could get the nod as vice chairman, yet in easy terms those with journey producing earnings for the national events has a gamble at getting the nomination. Hillary won't get the nomination, with the aid of fact even nevertheless she has been very useful filling the DNC coffers, there are such a brilliant number of democratic politicians that hated her and bill and are waiting for a gamble to pay her back. Her very own occasion participants might eviscerate her in the process the primaries. although that is humorous that the DNC has began asserting "the reasonable Hillary Clinton" while her politics are left of socialism. as though calling her a reasonable makes her one! yet between the two Condi wins. effective you will possibly want a phase of racists who will vote against her on suitable, yet there are a brilliant number of girls individuals who want an clever woman candidate, and that does no longer be Hillary. in case you like a woman president how approximately Elizabeth Dole. She's a clever, functional and sucessful employer woman and baby-kisser. Her working of the ARC validated her compassion and intelligence..

2016-10-17 23:44:58 · answer #2 · answered by delcampo 4 · 0 0

Hard to say....

Hillary is a much better politician, and is way more ruthless. (Probably the best pure politician since Nixon before his meltdown.) But she's awfully divisive, and the Republicans can be taken this time, I believe. We Democrats need to nominate someone who'll appeal to the middle of the road voters and the independents...and I don't think Hillary does that very well.

Condi Rice is a political lightweight and...even though she would have very experienced people working for her (who are almost as ruthless as Hillary)...I think the lack of actual political experience would be critical.

I don't think either one will get her party's nomination.

2006-09-25 15:50:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Probably hillary.... because of her political background is a little more firmer than rice. Rice is associated with bush and bush doesnt have a good track record. Hillary does. She is doing some decent things in NY state with economics and schools. She also has a husband, who did well for the economy as prez. I think condi sort of screwed herself if she plans on running because bush is on her resume. Though she does have some decent things behind her.

Hil would win.

2006-09-25 15:38:50 · answer #4 · answered by Sarah 3 · 1 1

Neither. Clinton will never gain her party's vote becasue of her relation to Bill. We are thinking he is so great, but if you remember that he is a liar... he wasn't so great. Bill will he Hillary's undoing. As far as Condy Rice, you have to remember that Dick Cheney is the VP. All of the Republicans that are still loyal to the GOP are going to endorse him. He's been in the White House since the Nixon Administration. Bear in mind, folks, that if Cheney makes the White House, you will all see who it was behind all of these wars. It's not Bush. It's Cheney and Rumsfeld. God save us.

2006-09-25 15:47:52 · answer #5 · answered by Jamie 5 · 0 0

Hillary far and away because she has more experience in government and dealing with foreign governments, and though some folks are fond of saying that she could not cause the big reason is bill lied to the country which one would you rather have someone that lied about their personal life that you forgave or someone that backs a liar that gets people killed and it is not his personal life but others lives he controls that he lies and gets killed in war. Rice is a bush woman head to toe so to vote for her would be a continue program of the bush white house.

2006-09-25 16:54:00 · answer #6 · answered by billc4u 7 · 0 0

They both fell from the Ugly Tree and hit every branch on the way down.. Old Hillery looks like a woman who has been cheated on all her life and she is just tired..

Condi Rice looks like a female Mike Tyson looking for someones ear to bite off . Neither has what it takes to run the country ..

2006-09-25 15:52:27 · answer #7 · answered by Shawn S 3 · 0 1

I don't like either... but I think Hillary would.

Condi is connected to the Bush Campaign and they only have a 39% approval rating now. That's a rough starting point. I'm not sure people trust her. She'd have to show she's not Bush Part 2.

Hillary would have to show she's not Clinton Part 2, also.

2006-09-25 15:33:05 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 2 1

I think Condi would win.

Hillary has a big problem, like alot of other Dems, like her husband, they like to throw money at problems rather than find a real way to fix problems, and instead of encouraging people in who are poor or in the low middle class to make themselves better, she would rather talk that she would help, but in actuallity she would do like her husband did and raise taxes.

2006-09-25 15:41:24 · answer #9 · answered by Bryan M 5 · 0 1

Condi!

2006-09-25 15:37:40 · answer #10 · answered by AngiesHusband 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers