I suspect it depends on your choice in terms of justice. Was it fair to be the child or children molested - absolutely not. However torturing a perpetrator makes you no better than him.
Studies have indicated that castration is not effective with many of these people - they simply find an item to become an extension of their sexual organ - a broom handle, etc.
Many of them are sick and were subject to abuse as children themselves - many need treatment. Would you kill someone suffering from schizophrena simply because they were mentally ill? Many need to be kept in the prison system for the rest of their lives because its unsafe for them to be allowed out in public ever again.
Any abuse is about power or lack of it - child abusers choose children because they are weak, powerless and non-threatening.
One answer pointed out that society once condoned sodomizing boys in Greece by pairing them with older male mentors - our current society does not condone child abuse however condones pornography involving abuse. There is no easy answer -
2006-09-26 09:25:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ginger W 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Personally, I agree with you that there's no punishment severe enough for anyone who would hurt a child.
There are theories of punishment that are imbued in the criminal justice system, and what you are talking about is making such a spectacle of the perpetrator that it would educate the public never to make such a horrible choice. I'm with you on that, but I suspect some human-rights groups would be after us.
2006-09-25 14:49:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
For what the second one man or woman reported, Caucasians are slowly turning out to be a minority trust it or no longer, there are better "minorities" than Caucasians. yet besides the very undeniable truth that i must claim something, u . s . a .'s authorities (no i'm no longer bias, I stay right here!) is quite corrupt yet i don't believe of jailhouses and courts may enable White human beings go that really. If I were White, i don't believe of i'd enable a fellow White man or woman who changed into prevalent for baby molesting close to my youngster. No way in f***ing hell.
2016-12-02 01:50:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by helmers 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
its all about sociology. the molester had something happen in his or her rearing that triggered an imbalence in behavior, although its horrible to think about, in their minds its the norm. same way one person might be a poker addict or a jogging addict. heres a story... in ancient greece and rome, boys would be paired up with an older soldier (to be mentored into being a soldier himself) but in reality this meant that the 7 or 8 year old boy was sodomized on a regular basis and it was the NORM.
2006-09-25 14:52:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Elizabeth M 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Think about it this way - what if you were the child molester? How would you feel about getting a flaming rod stuck up your butt?
2006-09-25 15:15:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Some of those idiots would enjoy it...I say a $0.79 bullet to the head would save time trouble and taxpayers money...Thanks!!!
2006-09-25 19:07:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by drivertruckmoss 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In this case, do on to others as you would like to be done on to you doesn't apply here.
That's just childish.
Im sure there is alot of things going down in prisions, to these people, that's no one wants to know about.
2006-09-25 14:51:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
dont worry when they go to jail they get tortured by the jailers some are even killed
2006-09-25 14:48:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by jettalady 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Civilized people don't do that. Unless they are Republicans. I am in favor of life in prison for the first offense.
2006-09-25 14:48:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by doggiebike 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Sorry, that wouldnt be legal.
That would be considered "cruel and unusual punishment", and it's kind of unnecessary.
2006-09-25 14:47:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Steven B 6
·
0⤊
1⤋