English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

lim
x->a

x^2 + x + 4
-----------------
x^3 - 2x^2 + 7

For values of a does the above function exist? What does this say about the
continuity of this rational function?

2006-09-25 14:16:39 · 6 answers · asked by Silver 2 in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

To reply to Jim there, this isn't my homework. It's an extra optional assignment, and I personally would like to understand how to solve it.

I realize that to find where a exists, I need to find where it doesn't exist first, which would be where the denomiator is equal to zero, but I don't know how to get that.

2006-09-25 14:22:58 · update #1

6 answers

Replace x with a.
(a^2 + a + 4) / (a^3 - 2a^2 + 7)
The numerator is always positive.
This limit will not exist when the denominator equals zero.
a^3 - 2a^2 + 7 = 0 when a = -1.4288
The function is discontinuous at x = -1.4288

2006-09-25 14:44:46 · answer #1 · answered by MsMath 7 · 0 0

i'm going to offer you hand-waving (experience-making) solutions fairly than something technical. a million) 2 factors. x=a million and x=2. with the aid of fact that is truthfully the cost of a parabola with x-intercepts at a million and a couple of, fairly than "dip under the axis" at those factors the parabola "bounces" back interior the effective. those 2 "leap factors" are the standards the place f(x) isn't differentiable - they do no longer look to be "mushy." 2) fake. unquestionably the decrease is comparable to a million. logx provides you with what means of 10 the extensive type is and the a million/x exponent will shrink that all the way down to a million. Take a brilliant extensive type as an occasion: one thousand million (a million billion). log one thousand million = 9. Now 9^(a million/one thousand million) is very close to to 9^0 that's a million. in certainty as you develop x, the exponent will become so tiny as to in certainty be 0, on an identical time as the log x section grows lots extra slowly. 3) fake. cos(0) = a million. a million^infinity = a million. Your decrease = a million. i be attentive to that may no longer precisely rigorous therapy of the undertaking, even though it shows the assumption. for terribly super exponents n, the cost of cos(x)^n would be equivalent to 0 different than very close to to x=0. no count how super n is, as you attitude an arbitrarily small distance from x=0, the function will shoot back as much as a million, considering that cos(0)=a million. 4) It effective is. For all numbers between 0 and a million, the two the 1st term and 2nd term around all the way down to 0. At x=a million, the two words equivalent a million, and a million-a million=0. For numbers as we talk after a million, the 1st term rounds all the way down to a million^2, that's a million. the 2nd term may well be, as an occasion, a million.a million^2, that's a million.21, which rounds all the way down to a million (nonetheless 0). that is not till x=sqrt(2) that the 2nd term rounds to 2. for this reason non-quit at x=a million.

2016-10-17 23:41:17 · answer #2 · answered by delcampo 4 · 0 0

You are correct about finding where the denominator is zero. The denominator is x^3 - 2x^2 + 7. This has one real root at x=-1.429.

2006-09-25 15:27:32 · answer #3 · answered by gp4rts 7 · 0 0

to find discontinuity of a rat. fxn set denominator = 0 solve for x, these are the values which cause discontinuity simple as that !!

caveat: you must be able to factor the den. since its is a polynomial hopefully u have these skills...

2006-09-25 15:10:21 · answer #4 · answered by ivblackward 5 · 0 0

Do your own damn homework. Open that math book and look it up. You'll save more time doing it yourself than posting that crap here.

2006-09-25 14:18:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 5

sorry.i will tryt

2006-09-25 14:34:34 · answer #6 · answered by bunbury 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers