no why woudl it be child molestation?? and they do that when the baby is born. and it only takes a couple of seconds its not like it takes time to do it and it doesnt happen more then once.
2006-09-25 14:20:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
An age old debate! I didn't circumcise my son because I'm not Jewish. I think that a god that wants parents to cut off the ends of their little boys ***** is a blood-thirsty psyco......I studied my *** off looking for the pros and cons, and there are way more cons to circumcission than pros. I love the argument that men are more likely to get STD's if they have foreskin. Acually, they are less likely. The foreskin protects the penis from infection. The groups that they are studying are people who already have a higher rate of STD's. So it has nothing to do with whether or not you have foreskin, it has to do with your sexual habits and your cleanliness.
BTW, I had a radio show about a year ago and one of the things I used to do was look up weird news. A Rabbi gave 3 babys herpes and 2 of the babys died, because he gave them a circumcission the old fashioned way, which is sucking the fresh blood out of the head of the penis. Most Rabbi's now a days use a tube like device to suck out the blood, but I guess this guy was really old school because he just stuck his mouth right on there and sucked away. I'm sorry, but I consider that sick and a form of abuse.
I've been with both types of penises. And it really doesn't make much of a difference sexually. It seems like penatration is easier with an uncircumsised penis. Uncircumsised penises get dirty under the foreskin if you don't take care of them and they get a smell. Its the same smell as ball sweat though and all guys get that if they don't clean themselves. The point is, its not cleaner, its just how the person's hygine is.
2006-09-25 17:27:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
No not child molestation as you mean it.
it is just done before the male child can deside for his self if he wants it done or not.
not all males are automaticly circumcissed only with the permission of the parents.
the U.S.A. is a mostely Christian country that uses a lot of the Jewish traditions of which Circumsion is one of their practices handed down from the Biblical days.
The practice is fading out as as you pointed out it is not nessary to have it done . just easier and less painful than waiting until latter for those who want to have it done.
2006-09-25 15:04:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I can tell you one thing I dont like queers or assualts by them I have rip a lot of ***** off by a hand pull and I have notice this if they are circumsize they come off real quick and easy if they are not it is more difficult so it is a biological function to have that frenum on to prevent amputation. So I guess the first mayhemist had that in mind when he amputated the skin off.
2006-09-27 06:05:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Alright I believe my answer could be very well informative, I once dated a man, from a forienger country, I live in USA, he was the forienger, his penis was not circumcized. He did reference to me that the penis was to be kept clean at all times, after sex, after use of washroom, he cleaned his penis constantly. Circumsized penis is sanitary compared to uncircumsicized, however the real point here is the man is either clean or not... shouldnt matter if the penis is circumcized or not.. agree
2006-09-26 04:41:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by ﺸÐïåMóñdÐôññåﺸ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Be quiet! If you don't like it, leave the USA! Don't bash a countries practice without UNDERSTANDING THAT IT IS DONE FOR CLEANLINESS REASONS!!! You obviously don't understand what 'child molestation' is! You should meet with the hundreds and hundreds of children who have been rapped as babies or youngster! YOU IGNORANT FOOL!
2006-09-25 14:51:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Proud MOM 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
well some countries think fat women and men are attractive, and the ancient romans thought that bathing in oil was more hygenic, i will get my baby boy circumcised because ive been raised to think that it is the norm, its attractive, and it is more hygenic. The last thing i want is for my boy to be considered different in any way. im not saying that it is right but its just the norm and its difficult to change the norm, you may just be getting a little culture shock.
2006-09-25 14:28:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Elizabeth M 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
answer a) Americans are cleanliness freaks and they find the mere idea that dirt might accumulate under the foreskin disgusting. So some unscrupulous surgeon created a myth that it was more hygienic to remove it at birth in order to make a quick buck, and was successful beyond all expectations.
answer b) Medicine has long been dominated by the Jews, and they transmitted this custom of theirs to the main body of US society for reasons that can only be guessed.
2006-09-25 14:44:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Svartalf 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
What the hell does this question have to do with mythology & folklore ?
That is the stupidist question I have herd on here yet.
You are a A s s Bag and f--k face
2006-09-26 05:25:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by 8upcoaldigger69 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
my bf wishes he was circumised a man needs to wash an uncircumsized penis all the time after he pees,orgasums ect if theres alittle bit of moister he can get a bacteria infection just like a woman gets a yeast infection a guy could get a bacteria infection if not taking care of if the man is circumcised he doesnt need to worry about it
2006-09-25 14:24:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by jettalady 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
Circumcision is a religious rite Freedom of religion dude. Check out my answer to your other question.
2006-09-25 15:28:49
·
answer #11
·
answered by timex846 3
·
1⤊
0⤋