The National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) report was filed in April and concluded that the war in Iraq was making the terrorist problem worse not better. Why did the American people have to learn about this by a leak? Why didn't our president do what's best for the country's security and act on it immediately?
2006-09-25 13:41:19 · 11 answers · asked by Dastardly 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Mainly because it does only represent a small potion of the overall report and contradicts the message that "we are winning this war". I'd be more concerned about where these leaks are coming from than the info. By the way, did you catch the clip of Bush saying that the war in Iraq will be a comma in the history books. Almost 3,000 young Americans dead, thousands more maimed, billions of dollars added to the national debt. And then Rumsfeld today stating that the Ist armoured division are being "asked" to stay longer . Asked? Please get out and vote in November. This madness has to stop before the entire constitution becomes a comma in history books.
2006-09-25 14:02:06 · answer #1 · answered by Bob D 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You ask, “So how come McCain and his ‘advisors’ thoroughly overlook approximately this national secure practices emergency and concentration on different ‘enemies’ ??????????????????????????” you're a real Obama supporter. You attack the opponent with some intentionally deceptive BS yet do no longer grant a “answer” of your very own. I’m effective your messiah is pleased with you. Obama has expressed an activity in “negotiating” with Iran, North Korea and Syria, yet he has pronounced no longer something approximately speaking to China or India. Why is he IGNORING them and the “national secure practices emergency” they supposedly characterize? perhaps in case you deliver Obama a map he would be waiting to make your suggestions up the place China and India are. Please be effective the map has sought after labels. in any different case, he’ll in all probability seem in his kitchen cabinet for “China” and in Oklahoma for “Indians.” As you be attentive to, your guy isn't too wonderful and desires each and all of the help he can get. Oh, you don’t be attentive to the place China and India are, the two? Sorry! My mistake…. Did you notice that as quickly as your Senator be attentive to-It-All become in Oregon he pronounced he become blind to the Hanford Nuclear Waste website? The storage tanks there are leaking and the radioactive waste is interior the underground water furnish – and it’s making its way in direction of the Columbia River, which runs suitable by downtown Portland. Now, that could be a “national secure practices Emergency.” I’m effective you observed Robert Redford’s action picture, “A River Runs by It.” He might have been speaking approximately Portland, yet he might have used a distinctive call: “A River Runs by It – And That River Will quickly Be Radioactive as Hell.” you somewhat could understand which you do your candidate no want once you're making a assertion (thinly disguised as a question) that is pregnant with innuendo yet completely lacking in substance. you're making it clean that your guy isn't offering to lead us, in easy terms to deceive us. you may feel embarrassment approximately your self. And your candidate could feel embarrassment approximately himself for attempting to declare the “severe street” on an identical time as he's attaining for it from his residing house interior the gutter.
2016-10-17 23:34:14 · answer #2 · answered by cardish 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You misrepresent the report. That conclusion was the speculative analysis of some and was only one small part of the report.
The Islamic death cult is clearly growing. It was growing before 9/11 and after 9/11, and would be growing if we weren't in Iraq.
Hence the need to reform the Middle East via democracy.
2006-09-25 13:45:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
How does revealing what they revealed help one single soul do ANYTHING besides give something for the liberals to politicize?
OF COARSE when you fight terrorism that is going to strengthen their resolve. Is that the only answer to terrorism you liberal nutjobs know? Cut and run, hide in your country, hope they like you after that, and wait for the next Sept 11th?
Let me let you in a secret of war others know but you dont apparently, any enemy facing heavy losses has 2 choices, get demoralized, or tighten up. So what do you expect FROM religious nutjobs that think that flying airplanes into buildings and killing thousands of people gets them to Heaven? You can defeat terrorism by fighting it but youll never defeat it by doing nothing guranteed.
2006-09-25 14:12:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Who honestly believes Bush cares a flip about national security?
Its power he's after.
2006-09-25 13:54:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
He probably thought no one would believe him. No one believes him about 9/11 so why would you believe him about that? People would think he made it up to stay in Iraq.
2006-09-25 13:53:54 · answer #6 · answered by Luekas 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You haven't seen the whole report. The press and dems are cherry picking through it....just the news of the day that isn't any news.
2006-09-25 14:00:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because it (until illegally leaked to the media) was a classified document.
AND: What the left-leaning liberal mainstream media has hyped is only a small, miniscule part of the entire report.
2006-09-25 13:44:28 · answer #8 · answered by Albannach 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Because he will never admit he made a mistake. Typical Drunk!
2006-09-25 13:44:54 · answer #9 · answered by Charlooch 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because he is a big pansy :)
2006-09-25 13:45:15 · answer #10 · answered by Lolli 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋