THAT NEOCON BIASED REPORTER WOULD MAKE HIS QUICK SMEAR QUESTIONS THEN BILL WOULD TRY TO ANSWER THEM, THEN HE'D TRY TO MOVE ON. BILL WOULD SAY, YOU ASKED THE QUESTION NOW DO YOU EVEN WANT AN ANSWER?
THE REPORTER WAS A JERK. NO WONDER HE WORKS FOR FAUX NEWS.
2006-09-25 12:07:03 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Clinton didn't let him get away with it, huhu ^^
(common tactic the right use..you start making sense, they start interrupting, changing topic, etc.)
2006-09-25 12:14:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Dem's can't take what they dish out, it is fact the Clinton dropped the ball, and it is in the record, and it has been proven, different story isn't it when Clinton is taking the hot seat. The Dem's have been undermining the President every step of the way, and it is about time the truth comes out about Clinton. and by the way Chris Wallace was not a plant, he was against ABC showing that movie about the Clinton administration. Boy Clinton really blew his stack didn't he. He can't stand the truth, but of course you already no that.
2006-09-25 19:15:47 · answer #2 · answered by hexa 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because all of the Bush *** kissers want to make Clinton the fall guy for his mess. After that report people in high places admitted that Clinton had done everything in his powers to find him and left detailed plans and names of people to finish the job, but they were demoted. So who didn't attempt to do their job. What we should really be asking about this war is where are all of the weapons of mass destruction.And how many more of our soldiers are we willing to loose for nothing?
2006-09-25 19:16:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well, he didn't want Clinton to say anything that would make him look good and Bush look bad. That interview was one of the great moments of television journalism of the past 25 years at least! Go get 'em Bill !!!!!
2006-09-25 19:13:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because he wanted to insert his own words where Clinton would have inserted his. That's the secret to how Faux news got to be so faux in its news reporting.
High 5 Osama W. Bush!
2006-09-25 19:09:32 · answer #5 · answered by Got pretzels? 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
So Osama, you have solved the problems with faux news. The whole thing is owned and operated by jerks. Neo-cons love jerks the voted twice for one.
2006-09-25 19:11:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yes he was, but you are a jerk for that Osama Bush profile and morph.
Get with it, you are turned into a wacko as bad as the conservowackos.
2006-09-25 19:20:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He only wanted to score points by making statements instead of finding out the truth.
2006-09-25 19:10:19 · answer #8 · answered by The Gadfly 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Clinton would hardly let Wallace ask a question. He just sat there waving that finger around blaming the "vast right wing conspiracy"... the only gentleman sitting there was Chris Wallace.
2006-09-25 19:12:31 · answer #9 · answered by sister_godzilla 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Because he doesn't want to hear the truth. he is good for fox idiots. The evil incompetent foolish, Bush supporting, un_American news channel.
Chris wallace is the same as the pig--now you know the meaning of that Osama Bush. Shalom ;)
2006-09-25 19:08:15 · answer #10 · answered by JS 3 · 5⤊ 3⤋