English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

No. But it was used ,as a posture, to show that Washington "cares."

Ugh. What a gluttonous white elephant false appearances are!

2006-09-25 11:45:04 · answer #1 · answered by urbancoyote 7 · 0 0

Absolutely not...that is a private enterprise....those chicken pols would give our money for any endeavor to "look like they care." The superdome has insurance and if the pols really meant business they'd go after those theiving insurance companies.

2006-09-25 19:06:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

NO!!! unless is was insured by the federal government, then absolutely NOT! whoever raised the funds to have it built in the first place should be responsible to in rasing the funds again or the insurance company should pay for it.

2006-09-25 18:36:04 · answer #3 · answered by Bella 5 · 0 0

No. Why should we as the tax payer pay for a new football field when the ones playing on it are making millions and millions of dollars to run around and throw a football.

2006-09-25 18:40:38 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

Not one Penny!

2006-09-25 23:09:53 · answer #5 · answered by CM 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers