"...They had eight months to try. They did not try. I tried. So I tried and failed," he (Clinton) said.
8 months vs. 8 years. Hmmmmm that's a snappy comeback.
That and he's like a foot taller than his interviewer and looked like he was going to slap him half the time - I think he foundled Wallace a couple times, why'd he keep putting his hand on Wallace's lap?
2006-09-25 11:18:11 · 16 answers · asked by dlil 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
As prearranged with Clinton's handlers - Wallace was reading questions that were emailed in - that's why he had the clipboard.
2006-09-26 03:18:37 · update #1
I was alarmed first & them amused. I was stunned that he seemed so out of control about something that happened
over 8 years ago. My favorite was his jabbing his finger on papers. I think he could use some counseling. President Bush remained calm while being called the devil & I am sure he was furious. Self control is imperative to politics & Clinton has always lacked it - "Monica".
2006-09-25 11:28:12 · answer #1 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Isn't it amazing? Conservatives have been bullied by the "out of the mainstream" press for years and have held up relatively well, with dignity. But let liberals be interviewed and pressed hard by a newsman and they go berserk. I guess they're not used to it since many of their buddies in the media are fellow liberals tossing nothing but softball questions. Great job Mr. Wallace!!
2006-09-25 18:34:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
CLINTON was hitting Wallace's clipboard with his stupid questions on it, with his finger. Wallace started this and Clinton let him have it.
At least Clinton admits the truth and doesn't lie about why our soldiers are dying in nonsense.Bush can't even say a single sentence
with out saying hmmm, hmmm . So is Bin Laden in IRAQ why hasn't Bush got him ?
Oh yea lets see here elections time is near so Bush will use terror again to try to get people scared into believing they need him and his people.
Ask the parents of a dead soldier who's fault is it?
2006-09-25 18:43:15 · answer #3 · answered by governmentslave 3 · 0⤊ 5⤋
I just caught a clip of that on the 5:00 news. It was pretty funny, he was mad......
I like how he said....look at that smirk you have on your face, you sure think you are pretty smart dont you....
Ive heard 2 yr olds come up with better cut downs.
2006-09-25 18:58:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Definitely, Wallace was the victim there.
It really wasn't "losing it", now hitting the man would have been losing it. You conservatives really like to make mountains out of molehills don't you?
What ever keeps the focus off your man in office right?
2006-09-26 00:08:33 · answer #5 · answered by C J 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I was expecting his head to explode like a Zit.
2006-09-25 18:32:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
He sounded like someone who felt guilty. Or had something to prove.
2006-09-25 18:24:59 · answer #7 · answered by Will 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Well, all that's important is that Clinton stated the facts. Clinton never shook hands with Saddam or Usama. And he's never showed an obsession with oil, killing Arabs, or anything besides getting his shlong swallowed!
Hey, wanna know what Bush thinks of the USA:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmJ0YCTVfwI
2006-09-25 18:31:12 · answer #8 · answered by The Man of Steel 4 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Real funny, look like the idiot was going to have a stroke one time.
2006-09-25 18:20:59 · answer #9 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Not as funny as when Bush lost it and cussed out the media! And not nearly as funny when Bush ties to give speeches. LOL!!
Good to see you people still stuck on a former president while the current one is the BIGGEST JOKE!
2006-09-25 18:20:54 · answer #10 · answered by kelly 2 · 2⤊ 6⤋