2006-09-25 10:48:49 · 48 answers · asked by Antoine C 1 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
Antho_c, ant_c and now antoine_c, when are you gonna end this charade?
2006-09-25 11:05:51 · answer #1 · answered by At Last WC2010 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
France
2006-09-26 23:09:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
France ... Italy seemed a bit smug that they won. And Materazzi mocked Zidane which made Zidane go off on his last match. It's pretty sad. Also, many Australians believe that Australia could have went further into the World Cup, after a constroversial penalty goal from Italy. Besides, I like France anyways!
2006-09-25 12:19:22 · answer #3 · answered by Alyssa 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Italy of route!! Italy ruled the first 0.5 and France were given fortunate with that penalty. If the penalty wouldn't have existed, Italy would have received with its genuine purpose. no matter if France ruled the 2d 0.5, they couldn't get through Italy's impressive protection and Buffon did large saves. So even although France performed somewhat sturdy, in the experience that they couldn't score it signifies that throughout the time of a few aspect Italy changed into also more beneficial. And contained in the shootouts it changed into success, and likewise the shooters for Italy were all somewhat somewhat sturdy and regrettably France had lost maximum of its large shooters....
2016-11-23 21:19:13 · answer #4 · answered by dungey 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Italy
2006-09-28 02:32:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Italy did deserve to win at the level of the world cup final if you win you deserve to walk away with the glory
2006-09-25 22:53:57 · answer #6 · answered by Tam 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Italy
2006-09-25 10:57:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
France
2006-09-25 10:50:55 · answer #8 · answered by Mike R 4 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Please, these questions really are getting old. We've already been asked that same question repeatedly for a very long time.
Italy definitely deserved to win, because:
a) they were stronger (had more talented players)
b) they actually worked as a team
c) they played fairly, excluding the headbutt incident, but even then, Materazzi shouldn't have accepted all of the blame
and, last but not least,
d) for heaven's sakes, any team deserves to win when they have a higher score than their opponent!
2006-09-25 12:42:47 · answer #9 · answered by WaterfallOfDestiny 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree England was robbed, we have the FA keeping that Swede as manager to blame.
But between France and Italy, i take France. They played very well and unlike the Italians, were not content just to sit back in front of goal. They attacked and made good plays and eventually beat Brazil, Spain, and others. Thats nothing against Italy, but France was much better to watch.
2006-09-25 10:54:08 · answer #10 · answered by Robert B 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
DESERVE !!!
Neither of them deserved to be in final at first place. There were more deserving teams like Argentina, Brazil, Portugal, and England.
Among France and Italy, Italy was slightly more better team than France in the world cup, they palyed better football. 10 of their players scored in world cup. So overall Italy deserved more than France, but was not most deserving team.
2006-09-25 11:11:54 · answer #11 · answered by R 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋