English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Aside from the money, just think about the fact that you were always in the public eye, could not have privacy. Would it be worth it? Worrying about children being kidnapped too. Is it all that great, really?

2006-09-25 10:45:09 · 20 answers · asked by shardf 5 in Entertainment & Music Movies

20 answers

No, never would I want all that relentless attention..not worth any amount of money...

2006-09-25 14:36:12 · answer #1 · answered by Debbie T 2 · 0 0

You can definitely be a movie star and not be in the public eye all of the time. The people in the public eye choose to be: Lohan, Simpson, Hilton. Hilary Duff is barely in the news, Amanda Bynes, Jamie Lynn Spears, Julia Roberts, Demi Moore, Gwen Stefani, Ben Affleck, Jennifer Garner, etc. do not go out and party all the time or go and do stupid stuff to put themselves in the news. Plus, they may move out of LA or NYC to pursue more normal lives. I would LOVE to be a movie star and take all of the fame and fortune and opportunities and options it gave me. Sure, some are in the public eye once in a while but in the meantime they live wealthy lives, can set up their children and families for the best, can promote and draw attention to their charities or causes, and can have FUN! Regular people have to worry about their children getting kidnapped too.

2006-09-25 17:52:18 · answer #2 · answered by Sarah 4 · 0 0

I would because I love movies and to entertain, I wouldn't be in it for the money. I want to act but I also want to be a writer or a director, or possibly both. If you truly love what you do and want to entertain people then thats would be okay. You can be a movie star and not be in the public eye, it's called not being a moron and being smart about what you choose to do with your life. If you only want the money then you deserve to be on the cover of tabloids and to be publicly embarrassed. The one's that are in it for the love of what they do deserve to be left alone.

2006-09-25 18:17:42 · answer #3 · answered by Hairy Lime 3 · 0 0

Judging from my personality and make=up, no I dont think I could handle living in a fishbowl....as it is I keep conversations limited with some co-works on my personal life....I dont go overboard but I do like keeping work and home SEPARATE! How can it be done as a celeb?

2006-09-25 17:52:26 · answer #4 · answered by Poptart 5 · 0 0

Being in the public eye would bug the shi.t out of me. Other than that, it would be great. I'd be rich, jet set all over the world, and be high as hell ALL THE TIME. Right on.

2006-09-25 17:46:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No way. I wouldn't want to be under that much scrutiny. Especially as a woman, I would probably have to lose 100 pounds to be acceptable.

2006-09-25 17:55:35 · answer #6 · answered by stuckinamoment 3 · 0 0

Heck no. Who wants all that? All people do is try to come up with juicy gossip about stars.
Besides, money and popularity aren't everything.

2006-09-25 17:51:10 · answer #7 · answered by iLLy W 2 · 0 0

No......I have many reasons and I don't want to take up to much space but through songs, and deep in their hearts, movie stars should know..."my life ISN'T really all that great...is it?"

2006-09-25 17:53:41 · answer #8 · answered by KeaJay 2 · 0 0

i actually wouldn't want to live a movie star's life. I find it rather lonely. Its hard to find another person to share the rest of your life with. And, if theres a breakup.. then everyone will be talking about it.

2006-09-25 17:46:59 · answer #9 · answered by sellatieeat 6 · 0 1

no, i woulndnt want to live in their place, no privacy and two, some of them dont know fact from fiction right Mike Myers

2006-09-25 18:50:15 · answer #10 · answered by JGreen 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers