What was the consenting and dissenting opinions in the supreme court case Gibbons v. Ogden?

Question

i have to do a project on the topic of Gibbons v. Ogden

a website would help out the best

Answer 1

The court's view was that the power to regulate interstate navigation is reserved to Congress, per the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.

Ogden's view was that navigation was interstate commerce, thus to be regulated by the State.

"The mind can scarcely conceive a system for regulating commerce between nations which shall exclude all laws concerning navigation." - from the case.

The second source is a link to the case text itself.

Answer 2

E. Congress had power to regulate interstate commerce. Supreme Court of the United States held that the power to regulate interstate commerce was granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The New York law was found invalid because the Commerce Clause of the Constitution designated power to Congress to regulate interstate commerce and that the broad definition of commerce included navigation.

Answer 3

gibbons vs. ogden .gov