English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-25 10:24:19 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

Obviously someone as mean as he was couldn't have approved of the things liberals approve of. Finally, he turned liberal and open-minded and began loving everyone and everything in life.

2006-09-25 10:28:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Conservative

2006-09-25 10:35:11 · answer #2 · answered by lucy02 6 · 2 2

Finally some comic relief.... I think he was conservative by nature but politically an independent... He didn't like anybody but he was rich, I can see him being the Ross Perot type of the Disney domain...

Oh crap! Ebenezer Scrooge, hell I don't know what he was I think he would screamed 'humbug!' at the halls of Congress given the chance... Maybe he was a Whig!

2006-09-25 10:32:36 · answer #3 · answered by Rick R 5 · 1 2

in case you havent said at the same time as wealthy human beings donate money it practically continually going to a charity or such that operates outdoors the rustic. not often do they donate to charity that reward undesirable human beings. Isnt it exciting how the wealthy donate to the undesirable helpless human beings in africa yet received't improve a finger to help undesirable human beings of their own us of a. they only write down on their success human beings off as being lazy and keen to stay off the gadget. They somewhat help human beings in 0.33 international international places, those who didnt assist in making them wealthy(because without out us non wealthy human beings their will be no man or woman to make those wealthy human beings wealthy). those who breed like rabbits inspite of no longer sufficient nutrients and rampant ailment. those that stay in international places that hasnt even been waiting to variety a superior authorities for 40 years. yet no longer the human beings that helped lead them to wealthy.....

2016-11-23 21:17:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Conservative he was against helping anybody, he treated people like they were something to be used by him, and he never had sex so the bitterness just build up in him.

2006-09-25 11:14:49 · answer #5 · answered by region50 6 · 1 1

He was a liberal who eventually seen the error of his ways and finally turned from the dark side and became a good Conservative....

2006-09-25 10:26:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Definitely conservative.

2006-09-25 10:30:42 · answer #7 · answered by brian2412 7 · 1 2

Neo con turned enlightened liberal at the end.

2006-09-25 10:35:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

one of your two mommies under liberal law

2006-09-25 12:20:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

He had deep issues..hey he wanted to do away with Christmas for crissakes!
The future spirit shoulda taken his azz out while he had a chance! =)

2006-09-25 10:29:55 · answer #10 · answered by *toona* 7 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers