Regarding Bill Clinton and his interview with Chris on Fox did Bill look like he was going to explode.?

Question

Anyone else get really pissed of when someone calls you on something you know you screwed up on. Geez Bill take a pill.

Answer 1

He doesnt like being confronted with the truth. The truth is that Yes Bush did have 8 months to try and capture osama, but billy had 8 years, and there are many testimonials from his people that he didnt go after osama.
billy is a traitor

Answer 2

That was vintage Clinton. He totally planned to "go off" at some point during the Fox interview. He is a great actor and made it look real, but this was like the fights on "Orange County Choppers".

His goal was to put the Republicans on the defensive by making the point that he did everything he could about Bin Laden and terrorism. If that were true, perhaps General Tommy Franks or General Norman Schwarzkopf would back it up. The truth is that both of those guys will tell you that Clinton was not interested in any kind of conflict.

He was just waiting for the right question to pounce on Chris Wallace. If you turn down the sound, you can almost hear him saying "I did not have sex with that woman....Miss Lewinsky"

Answer 3

Well, I suppose you'd feel a little upset when a question that could have been asked, "So, tell me a little about your college career," and instead is asked, "So, I understand you failed to get into medical school... feel pretty stupid, huh?" Chris Wallace asked Clinton ""Why didn't you do more - connect the dots and put them out of business?" in reference to Al Qaida and Osama bin Laden in particular. It was argumentative and inflammatory, and could have been asked like, "What are your thoughts on your anti-terrorism record during your presidency?" As Clinton went on to explain, he was sandbagged for eight months during his attempts to have bin Laden assassinated -- he was openly criticized for his efforts, and then openly criticized again by the same people who tried to prevent him from having the assassination carried out when he failed to do so. Wallace obviously had his own opinions of Clinton and didn't maintain an objective viewpoint -- didn't enter the interview with one to begin with. Personally, I'd have been pissed, too, when I was trying to promote a program I believed in (his Global Initiative), in an honest effort to help people worldwide, and instead get attacked by a right-wing media pit bull on a topic that had nothing to do with why I was there.

Answer 4

He was a bit upset.....par for the course....that is the way he wanted it...he needed to deflect attention from the truth, from Wallace's questions.....He was a Rube during the interview, he was a Rube during his presidency.....
all the libs say his ONLY crime was the whole Lewinsky thing...well, in my opinion...any President DUMB enough to get CAUGHT DOING IT in the Oval office it far too STUPID to run the country!
And any Woman WEAK enough to stand by her man through that kind of embarrassment has no business in a position requiring strength of character!!!!

Answer 5

I think Bill's point is that the current government would prefer to place blame than take responsibility...any president inherits jobs that are undone...and the presidents job is then to complete them in one way or another, instead of saying "well HE didn't do it so I don't have too.....

Answer 6

Monica was under the table giving Bill CPR.

Answer 7

If he did nothing wrong (concerning the terrorists)then why on the defensive??
...Billy bob just doesnt have a clue when to quit or shut his pie hole in my opinion..Hillary needs to tighten the leash..

Answer 8

They also showed the cut scenes, which I did not see, but I heard as he was leaving, he said to one of his staff, "If that ever happens again, your fired." Or something to that extent.

Answer 9

People also get upset when they are wrongly accused of contributing to the deaths of 3000 people.

Answer 10

i dont blame Bill

I would get pissed also, but people learn from their mistakes