Check out my last two questions.
this one, I did not mention clinton until after they answered it. Look how many answers I got saying "no".(keep in mind some have erased their answers already)
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Akra1d0T.h6JeNeWdAE5I03sy6IX?qid=20060925134849AAUdsOP
Now, this one I asked, I mentioned clinton from the start, and they avoided answering it. There are virtually no answers.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Air2cwoBAcQAXwYoICBD43Xsy6IX?qid=20060925135132AAombEf
2006-09-25 10:08:34 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I'm kind of laughing at you for being SUCH a single-minded ideologue you actually think you've,ahem,"prooven" something.
Now that's funny.
2006-09-25 10:12:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
NicolasRaage, you will notice that my answer to your question concerning Bush’s right to “advocate” democracy was not what I had an issue with. It was his right to IMPOSE democracy that I, and many liberals I suspect, take issue with. The nuance is very important. To say he is advocating democracy in the Middle East makes it seem like he is going through peaceful channels to bring about democracy in a region that is not conducive to the concept. I hardly call the invasion of a country and appointment of puppet candidates that people have to choose from as something that resembles a free democracy.
I think if Clinton were asked the question with terminology that truly illustrated what Bush was doing – that Bush was trying to impose democracy - then Clinton, like any sensible person, would reject the notion. Even if Clinton still concurred that Bush has every right to IMPOSE democracy, does not mean that liberals have follow Clinton’s every word lock and step. Remember liberals are a diverse lot of people, and we are not sheepish conformists like many Neocons.
2006-09-25 17:31:47 · answer #2 · answered by Lawrence Louis 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Liberals are always good for a laugh, look at my questions. They are so simple minded and couldn't see the truth about anything if it hit em in the face. It is so easy to rile them up and hardly ever give a reasonable answer to any question, just like their heroes Kerry and Clinton.
2006-09-25 17:15:42 · answer #3 · answered by buffman316 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sometimes they are pretty laughable but then again so are conservatives from time to time. And I didn't mention anything about Clinton, and I saw the addendum you posted when I went to answer. I just gave my opinion on the matter.
2006-09-25 17:18:27 · answer #4 · answered by Rick R 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
LOL
Thanks for this one!
I do laugh at the liberals answers to my questions...but THIS...one of the best in a long time!
Jim W - take a break from this forum man, you are going to have a heart attack from all the rage you have built up.
2006-09-25 21:29:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The two that answered your second post did not answer your first. It's possible that the first answerers didn't want to respond to the same question re-worded. I doubt if it was anything deeper than that.
2006-09-25 17:15:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'm to busy laughing at the stupidity of the repubs. And in answer to your question yes he does have a right to promote democracy but not to shove it down there throats at the point of a gun.
2006-09-25 18:11:32 · answer #7 · answered by region50 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Nice!
2006-09-25 17:14:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Good One
Frankly, though I am sick of just laughing at their stupidity.
I am ready to start kicking the living sh*t out of them.
2006-09-25 17:14:12 · answer #9 · answered by SVern 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Could very well be that we have grown tired of your ignorance and bating.
2006-09-25 17:12:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋