Definitely not, using steroid is cheating.
and I cant allow cheaters to put a stain on any sports record book.
It will stain the integrity of the sports the individual joined to.
Thats why they stripped people of recognition if they found that The person is a steroid user.
2006-09-25 10:09:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Warhorse X 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes, ALL Steroid users should be banned.
That includes anyone that has had a cortisone shot, anyone that has taken any form of steroids for asthma, or other respritory issues.
You're a parrot, just squawking some line you've heard before and really have no idea what it means. You're clueless. You have NO idea what steroids are, and what they do.
In fact there are various forms of steroids that are legal in baseball, as well as numerous usages in everyday life.
2006-09-25 18:09:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by baseballfan 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Heck no!!! Other players are working their tails off all their lives to be in the record book. Why should a steroid user be entered in the record book? That's simply unfair.
2006-09-27 17:58:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Cubitpipi a fan of Amazins 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No! Because the whole notion of sports is that the best athletes with the best talent compete and when they are done playing, we honor people like Hank Aaron, Babe Ruth, Sandy Koufax, etc... for their talent and ability.
Now lets look at Jose canseco and Ken Caminiti, both players who admitted to steroid use. Though they probable Had a lot of talent, where does the line end and the added strength of steroids take over? They should not be admitted to the baseball hall of fame because to do so would to put them in the same category of players like Aaron, Ruth, Koufax, and many many more who played with whatever talent they had and made the best of it. Without drugs.
Sooner or later someone will bring up Bonds in this topic. if Bonds is shown to have used steroids, his records ought not to count and he should be banned from the Hall of Fame for defaming the game and using steroids illegally.
2006-09-25 17:51:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Robert B 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes, because MLB did not start steroid testing until last year. The steroid issue is MLB's fault because they let it happen for years before starting to test.
2006-09-28 15:30:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he would have to be. Otherwise most of the last 15 years of baseball would have to be taken out of the record books!
2006-09-26 09:40:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Tony M 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
no..its cheating. If they allow anyone that has taken steroids into the record books without an * then they should let Pete Rose in the Hall of Fame.
2006-09-25 18:03:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Nostradamus 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Wasn't against the rules of baseball and the player never tested positive then why keep McGuire out. I mean ok he had them in his locker, BUT do you have any proof he used them or was it merely that he had them?
2006-09-25 18:42:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.If it can be proven that the player was using steroids,than their stats should not be used in the record books.
2006-09-25 17:09:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by golfdog562002 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
If it only tested positive once, then then the rest are clean, i think they deserve it.
2006-09-25 18:38:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by K-Deeznuts 4
·
0⤊
0⤋