That is how Clinton defined democracy (in addition to majority rule) last night in an interview.
2006-09-25 09:51:32 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Absolutely they should. Are you suggesting that our invasion has created this? If so, you should take a closer look. The Iraqi government is running death squads, and over 100 people are being killed and tortured every day - 36,000 per year! That sure doesn't sound like "individual rights" or "restraint on those in power" to me.
Strange as it may seem, there are ways to accomplish things that don't involve dropping bombs on people. For instance, look at the radical transformation in China and the former Soviet Union - both of which were accomplished by trade and dialogue. This may not always work, but after four years, it's becoming increasingly clear that clubbing people into democracy is not an effective approach.
2006-09-25 10:16:04 · answer #1 · answered by Steve 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First set an example at home and then show it to Iraqi people how it is done.
2006-09-25 10:02:43 · answer #2 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It was so funny watching that redneck Clinton squirm and carry on! Chris Mattews is a good American and he did well in front of that liberal
2006-09-25 10:12:47 · answer #3 · answered by buffman316 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not a liberal, but i would say...sure
2006-09-25 10:03:04 · answer #4 · answered by DEP 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋