Loved the first one, second was quite good too, esp. how they tied the characters into the ones from the first movie, but the third wasn't as good cos it was completely seperate from 1+2,
I think the point of FD3 was mainly to wait for the funny gory deaths. (at least thats why i watched it!!)
2006-09-26 02:29:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by natstally 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The first one was great, the second one wasn't bad, but like all sequels they never match the first so I guess when I finally get round to watching FD3 I might be laughing too.
2006-09-26 03:32:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I haven't seen it yet and probably wont either. I find when sequels of films, particularly horror, go into a third session they become so benign and almost a parody of themselves. Fine go for HORROR FILM 2, but stay there.
Freddy Kruger was a testament to this statement.
2006-09-25 16:59:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Treat Infamy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't even know what FD3 is! Must be reeeeally good...
2006-09-25 16:52:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i don't think it was supposed to be a horror film, i laughed at the nail gun death the most.
2006-09-26 07:46:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by buffy Fan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If your a male then that answers your question
All males laugh at horrors
I love them
2006-09-25 17:40:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
totally agreed.
me too were laughing while watching the movie
i just waisted my 2 hours on it
2006-09-25 17:05:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by pure gold 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
havent seen it yet, but i liked the first one
2006-09-25 16:53:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Union Jack 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was appalling!! Though I did have my eyes closed thro most of it...!!!
2006-09-25 17:04:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋