English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If the jury finds a man guilty,(no offense) they're only regular people with maybe NO studies of law & justice whatsoever, and the judge does not agree with that decision, can he overule and say he's innocent? If the jury decides on a man's fate, what's the point of a judge being there?

2006-09-25 09:32:13 · 25 answers · asked by ruthteen 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

25 answers

( override the jury's verdict) A judge is there to ensure everyone is doing their job correctly. The lawyers have limits as to what they can enter into evidence as well as how to call witnesses, the judge regulates this. The judge also reads the charges to the jury. A judge can enter adjudication notwithstanding the jury if he feels their is gross misconduct on the part of the jury

2006-09-25 09:35:51 · answer #1 · answered by jimmyluger 3 · 1 1

A judge rules on questions of law while a jury answers questions of fact. The only way a judge can overrule a jury (very rare) is if the judge finds that, as a matter of law, the jury cannot find the person guilty for what peoples would characterize as "technical" reasons.

At trial, the judge is generally there to regulate the trial and determine evidentiary and legal issues. The actual factfinder (in ajury trial) is the jury. The law finder is the judge.

2006-09-25 09:45:02 · answer #2 · answered by Aaron F 2 · 0 0

The judge decides all issues of law and the jury decides all issues of fact. For example, the judge will not allow evidence to be introduced at trial that will confuse the jury, or is not reliable, like lie detector results; the jury decides if the guy pulled the trigger or not. A judge will throw out a case if there is no evidence at all, because, as a matter or law, there has to be evidence to convict someone. A jury can decide to convict or not based on the evidence presented.

2006-09-25 09:40:07 · answer #3 · answered by www.lvtrafficticketguy.com 5 · 3 0

The judge ensures that the trial proceeds according to the law. The average citizen doesn't know the in's and outs of the criminal justice system, so the judge is there to make sure the process runs smoothly and legally, even though the final decision is left up to the jury.

2006-09-25 09:40:41 · answer #4 · answered by chocolate-drop 5 · 1 0

The judge is one of the most important positions in the trial/justice system. It is his responsibility to insure that the trial is done according strictly by law, and the rights of the accused are followed. The judge decides if certain evidence is legally admissible, and decides on very important issues brought before him by attorneys. If the trial is not followed strictly by established law, the state supreme court, or ultimately the US Supreme Court can reverse whatever ruling was given by that trial. Juries can be influenced by attorneys who appeal to their emotions and personal thinking. Where the trial must be held by the Judge, to be administered fairly strictly according to law.

2006-09-25 09:39:35 · answer #5 · answered by ROBERT H 1 · 3 0

The Judge is supposed to know the law pertaining to the case and decides what will and will not be allowed into evidence.

The Jury is supposed to be the unbiased third party who weighs the evidence admitted to reach a verdict.

2006-09-25 09:52:35 · answer #6 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 0 0

To keep order and make sure everyone is following the rules for example:: I object......

Also cause sometimes the jury can have a verdict and the judge can over turn it.

2006-09-25 09:41:17 · answer #7 · answered by Trish H 3 · 1 0

THE JUDGE IS THERE TO KEEP THE TRIAL GOING AND TO RULE ON POINTS OF LAW. THE JURY IS THERE TO LISTEN TO THE EVIDENCE AND RULE ON GUILT OR INNOCENCE. I BELIEVE IF THE JURY COMES BACK WITH A VERDICT THAT IS DIRECLY CONTRARY TO THE EVIDENCE A JUDGE CAN DISMISS THE VERDICT. I THINK IT IS RARE FOR THAT TO HAPPEN THOUGH.

2006-09-25 09:38:03 · answer #8 · answered by SKYDOGSLIM 6 · 1 0

that is not a criminal case. this may well be a normal automobile twist of destiny, so the only court docket which will see that could be a civil court docket (desperate by potential of a choose) it is the reason you will desire to the call cops constantly, via fact now its "he mentioned/she mentioned". tell your husband that he can permit his coverage enterprise understand that a declare has been made against him; bypass to the scene of the twist of destiny and take distinctive photographs, showing precisely the place she grow to be, how she pulled out (im assumning this grow to be from a area highway or driveway or from a parallet motor vehicle parking area). It in all risk wont bypass to a tribulation if your husband's insuracne enterprise decides to settle.

2016-12-18 16:48:18 · answer #9 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

The role of the judge is to make sure the attorneys follow the law when asking their questions to the witnesses.

2006-09-25 09:40:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers