The report said most of them try to hide it from their husband or father cuz he would disown them for having it.
2006-09-25 08:10:53 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Being republican (and I am not) dosent meant that you have to believe in anti-abortion the fact is that a lot of women would hide that anyway.
2006-09-25 08:14:42 · answer #1 · answered by serenity_may 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I haven't seen that poll/study, but it's quite likely true.
Remember, not ALL republicans are "right-wing religious fundamentalists" -- some of them see no problem with abortion. And even if they're against abortion intellectually, that doesn't mean they wouldn't have one if they found themselves in a difficult situation. People are people, and any ideology (political party, religion, etc.) often gets ignored when real world situations confront them.
Kind of sad, really, since the republican party once stood for less government intervention in citizens' personal lives. The republicans of Barry Goldwater's time agreed that abortion was a personal decision that government should stay out of. It was only when the party was hijacked by the fundamentalist christians that it sold out on its principles -- selling its soul to the religious right in order to appeal to that block of voters.
2006-09-25 15:17:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
To my knowledge there is no data collected on the party affiliation of abortion reciepients .Because 55% are white and statistics being what theyare you can calculate the at least 5% are infact republicans .
2006-09-25 15:48:04 · answer #3 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like a typical liberal fabrication. If you had the 'intellectual curiousity' you liberals accuse Bush of not having, you'd have posted where you read this.
For all we know, it came from some extremist-leftist lie-filled blog.
You really need to source and cite all your alleged 'facts'. Otherwise, you're just another ****** with an opinion.
2006-09-25 15:26:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
What report? Where is the fact to back it up? Also I didn't realize party affiliation was asked by the doctor before an abortion... This doesn't seem like a scientific poll...
Also I am sure there are people who have had an abortion and have switched party affiliations back and forth from before and after their abortion.....
Are you going to Admit that you just lied about your report?
2006-09-25 15:13:56 · answer #5 · answered by alexg114 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
No.
The number 1 cause of abortion, is, was, and always will be the stigma on unwed mothers from the religious right.
They admit this.
2006-09-25 15:25:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Just because some major Republican figures are ultra right wing doesn't mean all are... There are still Republicans who believe in the main ideals of the party, limited government control over our lives... Since the Bible crowd has sunk their teeth in it seems to be hard to separate the two...
I'm sure there are a few Democrats out there somewhere who are heterosexual and don't do drugs....
2006-09-25 15:13:38 · answer #7 · answered by Andy FF1,2,CrTr,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Of course it's true! Most religious FREAKS have abortions. Atheist/Liberals account for 30% of all abortions while Repubes/Cons account for the rest.
There you have it, further GOP hypocricy. These values can be proven, by the way.
2006-09-25 15:17:29 · answer #8 · answered by Kookoo Bananas 1 · 3⤊ 2⤋
This is completely false its a just a rumour .
Anyone can say that 19% of rebulican daughters and wives has an abortion i can too say 59% daughters and wives had an abortion.
This is just a misconception.
2006-09-25 15:14:06 · answer #9 · answered by khuram r 1 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Now how or where you got that 19% ... is anybody's guess.
That you'd even forward such a percent without having the actual total number of GOP gals and interviewing/researching them in circumstances where you can get such evidence whereby it would be unimpeachable is cause for saying that your premise is....B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T!!!
This report (which I seriously doubt exists...)couldn't even make the National Enquirer or the Globe!
2006-09-25 15:16:01 · answer #10 · answered by Masterwooten 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋