yes..i'm dem and i did vote for him but wasn't he a sight? your thoughts..was he trying to hind something?
2006-09-25 07:55:28 · 11 answers · asked by ggmsixer 5 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Well, he did not hide anything well anyway.
The problem is, he lied in a civil case on the stand (purgery in a sexual harrasment case) IMHO 'did you have sex with this woman' is a valid question in a sexual harrasment case., and should have been punished ofr it. Anyone caught breaking the law should. Our congress (rep controlled) told the whole world that our president is above the law. Wrongs done by both sides there.
2006-09-25 08:08:04 · answer #1 · answered by Greg J 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
He said what I wish I could say to all the Faux News reporters.
I don't know why this is surprising anyone. Faux News makes a point of painting anything the Clinton administration (and for that matter any Democrat action) as wrong, horrible, or in any negative light that they can. They then go on to 'show' how Bush and Co. are beset on all sides by these incompetents which is why they fail instead of showing the truth that Bush and Co. are incompetent. I too would be pissed and am actually surprised Clinton even bothered to show up, knowing the way that Faux is.
As far as whether he lied or told the truth, consider these facts:
1) After the '93 bombing, all the suspects directly involved were subsequently arrested, charged, and convicted of the crimes; this cannot be said of a single person directly involved in 9-11 (KSM hasn't been charged or convicted)
2) After the bombing of the embassies, Clinton sent a couple missles into Afghanistan, to strike the terrorists "where they live" (I believe thats the quote Bush & Co. like to use). Immediately he was accused of playing "Wag the Dog" (there was even a movie put out about it) and his ability to continue was removed by the Republican controlled Congress. Because of this, he was unable to do anything in regards to the USS Cole incident.
3) After taking office, Bush then took more vacation time in his first 8 months than any president before. He ignored Richard Clarke's (and others') calls for continued pressure on Al Qaeda and proceeded to do absolutely nothing to prevent 9-11.
Which one do you think is more responsible for Al Qaeda being able to pull off 9-11?
2006-09-25 15:44:00 · answer #2 · answered by John J 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes , when are the Clinton's not trying to hide something ((Whitewater -Travelgate-Monica Lewinski-Somalia-Sudan & the refusal of bin Laden - suicide of Vince Foster ( Hilary's colleague)..?
Clinton is used to getting the easy questions -which is what he got from the liberal drive-by media his entire term in office .
Chris Wallace politely asked Clinton if he could have done more to get binLaden . Why was that so hard to answer? It was hard to answer because the Clinton's are still trying to "CREATE" a legacy .Their purpose now , is to wipe the slate clean of all their improprieties ; lies ;scandals ;disbarrment ;impeachment & perjury , from the minds of the American public . They were getting help in that direction from the drive-by liberal media . Clinton did not want Osama bin Laden because he was afraid of "fallout"-he cared more about his "approval rating " , than what was best for humanity .THAT is the Clinton legacy . When Wallace asked him the question - Clinton diverted & distracted , by going off on a tirade against his own F.B.I. ; his own C.I.A. - and then insulting Chris Wallace , the Republican party & a host of others - He lied when he said he was the only one trying . He lied under oath . Clinton lied to Hillary . Clinton lied to Monica and all his other mistresses AND the American public when he said he didn't have *** with "that woman".. The Clintons lied and let their partners in White-Water go to prison for them ( the McDougals ; etc. ). I doubt that Chris Wallace holds such a place of esteem in Clintons heart , that he was going to pick him -out of the entire world-to be truthful with . LOL
You bet he was hiding something .
2006-09-25 15:17:39 · answer #3 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It was not an out-burst. He stuck it to the fake Faux News channel. He made Wallace and Faux News look like the lying facists that they are.
How could you think Clinton was hiding something?
Did you see Bush on CNN with Wolfe Blitzer. The ignorant evil coward Bush would not even sit down and talk. I don't think your a Democrat you sound like a dishonest republican. You are not interested in the truth like Faux News, Murdock or any of the other republicans.
2006-09-25 15:24:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I think it was about time he let everyone know the truth and I belive him, I am sick of these sick REP. who carry on about his so called affair every president has had a sweetie in the back room so what's the big deal? as far as his job was conceded we were in good shape than look at us now, the world hates Americans I wonder who's fault that is?
2006-09-25 16:21:15 · answer #5 · answered by sandyjean 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Of course he was hiding something. That something being his culpability in now securing our borders prior to 9/11. He said Bush had 8 months to fix what he had 8 years to fix. Then he proceeded to insult Republicans ( we are not neocons) and he was just acting like a 2 year old.
2006-09-25 15:06:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and sounds like a duck, it is probably a duck. Yes, he was a sight, but then as the chief executive of our country, he lied under oath. What do you expect?
2006-09-25 15:23:41 · answer #7 · answered by loufedalis 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It did surprise me - He came across a little too strongly, I thought. A bit too defensive for me...
2006-09-25 15:06:16 · answer #8 · answered by luckistrike 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Clinton is a pathilogical liar.Won't know the truth if it came up and bit him on the butt.Just another whinny liberal that didn't get his/her way.
2006-09-25 15:15:43 · answer #9 · answered by army_doc7037203 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋
i thought it was great!!! finally someone in or was a part of this government actually having some emotion!!! i loved it!!
2006-09-25 15:25:39 · answer #10 · answered by miss me! 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋