what is wrong with this paragraph?
"“Any time you’ve got a charge of this nature that has some volatility, I just think it’s in her best interest, that she be protected from the influence of other inmates or possible harm to her,” Kelley said after the hearing.
According to authorities, Hall told police she also drowned Tunstall’s three children — ages 7, 2 and 1 — and stuffed them into a washer and dryer at the apartment they shared with their mother."
this woman, killed a girl that she grew up with, cut her open and took her fetus out, drowned her children and then stuffed them in her washer and dryer and has admitted to it all....but they want to isolate her from everyone else because they dont want her to get hurt and they want to look out for her safety....UMM HELLO!? SHE JUST KILLED 5 PEOPLE and ur giving her special treatment? bump that, let her suffer man, thats just not right what she did...am i wrong in thinking so?
2006-09-25 07:18:22 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
HEY VANMAN8U!!! she CONFESSED to doing it, how is that innocent till proven guilty bro, that doesnt apply to this...
2006-09-25 07:32:01 · update #1
Dont get me wrong, im not thinking horrible thoughts or anything, and i dont wanna get everyone in here going psycho lol... i just dont think its fair that this woman did such a morbid thing and is getting special treatment. i always say let God deal with the revenge, but must u really go out of your way to look out for her safety? i dunno man
2006-09-25 07:37:36 · update #2
some people are really starting to ge to me.....please explain how the innocent till proven guilty factor applies to this when the broad confessed to it and SAID THAT SHE IS GUILTY....think before u speak man, ignorance is not pretty
2006-09-25 08:12:42 · update #3
the thing is man in prison she would be killed - suffer yet not for long............let her rot alive in prison - that is suffering man or better yet let her be sentenced to death and that will take years until they finally do it and she will suffer till then. that happened in nashville or some where close - i saw it on the news this morning.
2006-09-25 07:24:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I have no idea why they would want to protect her but once she gets to prison she will have to go to admit which may take 3 to 6 months and that is with other inmates she may not last long. She will be beat a lot, I know a girl that went to prison and said these type of people have to fight every day for survival.
2006-09-25 14:34:15 · answer #2 · answered by livlafluv 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes she is innocent until she proven guilty. so give her a trial and when she is found guilty if she is found guilty. than put her in a prison. And let the other in-mate`s show her their own kind of justice. I believe like yanman8u said when he said. Jefferson said that it would be better for ten guilty people to go free. Than one innocent person to suffer for something they did not do. And for them to be wrong-fully punished for something they did not do.
2006-09-25 15:08:52 · answer #3 · answered by timothy b 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There is a lot of hate in this world. This Hate spread like a virus, weather we hate her for what she did or she hate those kids for what her mother did.
Billion of people and we all share generally the same value of life.
So ya I believe in the good and evil, right and wrong but the things that go through that woman's mind. Can she even really be save. what do we do with that person who is that damage.
should she be kill? is it more merciful?
2006-09-25 15:33:57 · answer #4 · answered by Kenshin 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Innocent until proven guilty. And inmates tend to go after people accused of crimes against children like they are pirhana. It is a precaution that has to be taken in order to ensure that the small percentage of people that are falsely accused and jailed for something like this, will not suffer an injustice. I believe thomas jefferson said ' Would be better for a hundred guilty men to go free, than for one innocent man be wrongly punished'
2006-09-25 14:23:13 · answer #5 · answered by vanman8u 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
That women should be subjected to torture beyond any ones ability to comprehend. She should die a horrifying death, but not before she suffers to her last breath. I don't want to support her in prison, I have my own kids to feed. Kill that Bit.ch
2006-09-25 14:24:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
You've heard the story of a man sentenced to death and got sick just before his execution. They called in doctors and gave him medication so he could be well enough to execute three days later.
That's our tax money at work.
2006-09-25 14:23:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
They should feed her to the lions and wish her luck
2006-09-25 14:22:08 · answer #8 · answered by dwh12345 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
This is something worthy of going to hell for, unlike premarital sex.
2006-09-25 15:09:41 · answer #9 · answered by spiritualcipher 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's best for everyone that she's placed by herself.
2006-09-25 15:19:00 · answer #10 · answered by luckistrike 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋