Masturbation without porn tops them both.
2006-09-27 02:50:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by SilentRunning 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Love without sex!
2006-09-26 02:26:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Say What? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sex without love.
2006-09-25 21:54:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anry 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sex without love.
2006-09-25 13:23:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Judas Rabbi 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither is worse. They both suck.
Sex without love is easy to get, it scratches an itch and you're free to move on. But too much or too often can make you feel empty and worthless. The connection to another person is missing.
Being with the one you love is fulfilling up to a point. But love without sex is missing the physical component so important in a satisfying relationship. The intimacy piece is missing, and that can kill a partnership
Pick your poison. It's all about balance.
2006-09-26 19:59:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by oh kate! 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sex with out love i might say
2006-09-25 16:26:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jubei 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Love without sex... I mean, lets be honest here, we have all had the sex without love, and damn it was fun... but if I were in love with someone and for some reason couldn't have sex with him, then I guess I would feel insufficient. Wouldn't that be a big ol' kick in the teeth?
2006-09-25 12:49:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Cutelilminxy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Having experienced both, I can say love without sex is worse.
2006-09-25 13:30:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by shortfrog 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sex without love, always sets up for problems to follow.
2006-09-25 12:46:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Fool in the Rain 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Simple enough question.
Love without sex, of course.
Because you don't have to be in love to enjoy a 1 niter, but if you could'nt make love to the one you loved, that would suck.
2006-09-25 12:48:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
sex with no love sucks
2006-09-25 12:47:18
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋